Eufinger H, König S, Eufinger A, Machtens E
Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1999 May;3 Suppl 1:S14-8. doi: 10.1007/PL00014501.
Consideration of alveolar profiles and clinical experience demonstrate that the transversal dimension has been neglected in dental implantology so far. For a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of alveolar bone height and width, 95 edentulous bony maxillae with standardized, measured, and classified cross-sections were analyzed. With four types of implants (minimum length, 10 mm), 1076 insertions were simulated at 269 cross-sections and evaluated with regard to type of implant, position of cross-section, and class of atrophy. Similar evaluation was carried out in the clinical part of the study on 24 consecutive patients with edentulous maxillae. Implant insertion could only be simulated in 35% of the cadaver cross-sections, but had been expected in an additional 4.5% based on their sufficient bone height; length reductions were necessary in another 6%. These results depended largely on the class of atrophy. Anterior cross-sections offered better conditions than posterior ones. In contrast, implant insertion was impossible in all 24 patients. Height was primarily inadequate in 22 patients, and in two patients with sufficient bone height inadequate transversal dimensions were only recognised intraoperatively. These results allow a quantification of the impact of vertical and transversal maxillary alveolar bone dimensions. This impact primarily depends on bone height, but even with sufficient height, reductions of implant length often become necessary. Both for the cadaver maxillae (12% of the cross-sections with expected implant insertion) and for the patients (8%), alveolar profiles remain in which height measurement alone leads to incorrect assessment and may even result in the interruption of precisely planned surgical procedures. The complexity and expense of implant-borne rehabilitation and the consequences resulting from incorrect preoperative planning therefore generally justify extended cross-sectional diagnostic measuring.
对牙槽嵴形态的考量以及临床经验表明,到目前为止,横向维度在牙种植学中一直被忽视。为了全面评估牙槽骨高度和宽度的影响,对95例具有标准化、测量和分类横截面的无牙上颌骨进行了分析。使用四种类型的种植体(最短长度为10毫米),在269个横截面上模拟了1076次植入,并根据种植体类型、横截面位置和萎缩等级进行了评估。在该研究的临床部分,对24例连续的无牙上颌患者进行了类似评估。在尸体横截面中,只有35%能够模拟种植体植入,但基于其足够的骨高度,预计另有4.5%可以进行;另有6%需要缩短种植体长度。这些结果在很大程度上取决于萎缩等级。前部横截面比后部横截面提供了更好的条件。相比之下,在所有24例患者中均无法进行种植体植入。22例患者主要是高度不足,在两名骨高度足够的患者中,横向尺寸不足仅在术中才被发现。这些结果能够对垂直和横向的上颌牙槽骨尺寸的影响进行量化。这种影响主要取决于骨高度,但即使高度足够,通常也需要缩短种植体长度。对于尸体上颌骨(12%的横截面预计可进行种植体植入)和患者(8%)来说,都存在仅通过高度测量会导致错误评估,甚至可能导致精确计划的外科手术中断的牙槽嵴形态。因此,种植修复的复杂性和费用以及术前规划错误所带来的后果通常证明了进行扩展的横截面诊断测量是合理的。