Kopydlowski K M, Salkowski C A, Cody M J, van Rooijen N, Major J, Hamilton T A, Vogel S N
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
J Immunol. 1999 Aug 1;163(3):1537-44.
The host response to Gram-negative LPS is characterized by an influx of inflammatory cells into host tissues, which is mediated, in part, by localized production of chemokines. The expression and function of chemokines in vivo appears to be highly selective, though the molecular mechanisms responsible are not well understood. All CXC (IFN-gamma-inducible protein (IP-10), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2, and KC) and CC (JE/monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MCP-5, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES) chemokine genes evaluated were sensitive to stimulation by LPS in vitro and in vivo. While IL-10 suppressed the expression of all LPS-induced chemokine genes evaluated in vitro, treatment with IFN-gamma selectively induced IP-10 and MCP-5 mRNAs, but inhibited LPS-induced MIP-2, KC, JE/MCP-1, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta mRNA and/or protein. Like the response to IFN-gamma, LPS-mediated induction of IP-10 and MCP-5 was Stat1 dependent. Interestingly, only the IFN-gamma-mediated suppression of LPS-induced KC gene expression was IFN regulatory factor-2 dependent. Treatment of mice with LPS in vivo also induced high levels of chemokine mRNA in the liver and lung, with a concomitant increase in circulating protein. Hepatic expression of MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, RANTES, and MCP-5 mRNAs were dramatically reduced in Kupffer cell-depleted mice, while IP-10, KC, MIP-2, and MCP-1 were unaffected or enhanced. These findings indicate that selective regulation of chemokine expression in vivo may result from differential response of macrophages to pro- and antiinflammatory stimuli and to cell type-specific patterns of stimulus sensitivity. Moreover, the data suggest that individual chemokine genes are differentially regulated in response to LPS, suggesting unique roles during the sepsis cascade.
宿主对革兰氏阴性菌脂多糖(LPS)的反应特征是炎症细胞流入宿主组织,这部分是由趋化因子的局部产生介导的。趋化因子在体内的表达和功能似乎具有高度选择性,但其背后的分子机制尚不清楚。所有评估的CXC(干扰素-γ诱导蛋白(IP-10)、巨噬细胞炎性蛋白(MIP)-2和KC)和CC(JE/单核细胞趋化蛋白(MCP)-1、MCP-5、MIP-1α、MIP-1β和RANTES)趋化因子基因在体外和体内对LPS刺激均敏感。虽然白细胞介素-10在体外抑制了所有评估的LPS诱导的趋化因子基因的表达,但干扰素-γ处理选择性地诱导了IP-10和MCP-5 mRNA,但抑制了LPS诱导的MIP-2、KC、JE/MCP-1、MIP-1α和MIP-1β mRNA和/或蛋白质。与对干扰素-γ的反应一样,LPS介导的IP-10和MCP-5诱导依赖于信号转导和转录激活因子1(Stat1)。有趣的是,只有干扰素-γ介导的对LPS诱导的KC基因表达的抑制依赖于干扰素调节因子-2。在体内用LPS处理小鼠也会诱导肝脏和肺中高水平的趋化因子mRNA,并伴随循环蛋白的增加。在库普弗细胞缺失的小鼠中,肝脏中MIP-1α、MIP-1β、RANTES和MCP-5 mRNA的表达显著降低,而IP-10、KC、MIP-2和MCP-1不受影响或增强。这些发现表明,体内趋化因子表达的选择性调节可能源于巨噬细胞对促炎和抗炎刺激以及细胞类型特异性刺激敏感性模式的不同反应。此外,数据表明,单个趋化因子基因对LPS的反应存在差异调节,这表明它们在脓毒症级联反应中具有独特作用。