Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后室性心动过速患者心脏性猝死的危险因素及预防

[Risk factors and prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarct].

作者信息

Kaliská G, Szentiványi M, Kmec P, Alberty R

机构信息

Interná klinika, Nemocnica F. D. Roosevelta, Banská Bystrica.

出版信息

Vnitr Lek. 1999 Jan;45(1):22-9.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The optimal therapeutic procedure for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after myocardial infarction involves identification of the patients with a high risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias using non-invasive risk markers, invasive electrophysiological evaluation of high risk patients, selection of treatment (ICD, RFTA, antiarrhythmics) and evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment. The objective of this work is retrospective evaluation of the incidence of risk markers of sudden cardiac death and the importance of programmed ventricular stimulation for the prognosis of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

  1. Retrospective analysis of 87 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction confirmed a high incidence of non-invasive risk markers. 2. For the long-term course a combination of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 0.40 + reduced heart rate variability (HRV) and abnormal ventricular potentials are most important (or dispersion of QT > 80 ms). The absence of ventricular extrasystoles on the Holter monitor does not predict the course without malignant arrhythmical episodes. 3. There is a statistically significant relation to the inducibility of BP during programmed ventricular stimulation with LVEF, persisting BP, RMS voltage of the terminal 40 ms (RMS40) and QT dispersion. 4. The inducibility of BP and persistence of inducibility on antiarrhytmic drugs in patients with LVEF < 40 is associated with a 14.8% incidence of SCD within four months after the first arrhythmic episode. The authors recommend to examine LVEF as the basis of risk stratification of SCD along with values of coronary reserve after myocardial infarction. In patients with LVEF (they recommend to examine Holter s monitor (assessment of HRV and analysis of ventricular arrhythmias) and mean ECG. Abnormal late ventricular potentials, reduced HRV or BP indicate programmed ventricular stimulation.
摘要

未标注

预防心肌梗死后心源性猝死(SCD)的最佳治疗程序包括使用非侵入性风险标志物识别有恶性室性心律失常高风险的患者、对高风险患者进行侵入性电生理评估、选择治疗方法(植入式心律转复除颤器、射频导管消融术、抗心律失常药物)以及评估治疗效果。这项工作的目的是回顾性评估心源性猝死风险标志物的发生率以及程序性心室刺激对心肌梗死后恶性室性心律失常患者预后的重要性。

结果

  1. 对87例心肌梗死后室性心动过速(VT)患者的回顾性分析证实了非侵入性风险标志物的高发生率。2. 就长期病程而言,左心室射血分数(LVEF)<0.40 + 心率变异性(HRV)降低以及心室电位异常的组合最为重要(或QT离散度>80 ms)。动态心电图监测未发现室性期前收缩并不能预测无恶性心律失常发作的病程。3. 在程序性心室刺激期间,BP的可诱导性与LVEF、持续BP、终末40 ms的均方根电压(RMS40)和QT离散度之间存在统计学显著关系。4. LVEF<40的患者中,BP的可诱导性以及抗心律失常药物治疗后可诱导性的持续存在与首次心律失常发作后四个月内心源性猝死发生率14.8%相关。作者建议将LVEF作为心源性猝死风险分层的基础,同时结合心肌梗死后的冠状动脉储备值进行检查。对于LVEF(他们建议检查动态心电图监测(评估HRV和分析室性心律失常)和平均心电图。异常的晚期心室电位、降低的HRV或BP提示进行程序性心室刺激。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验