Bhalla K N, Kumar G N, Walle U K, Ibrado A M, Javed T, Stuart R K, Reed C, Arbuck S G, Walle T
Division of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Florida 33136, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Jul;5(7):1723-30.
A Phase I and pharmacological study of paclitaxel administered as an outpatient, 3-h i.v. infusion just before a 5-day regimen of daily cisplatinum (CP) and a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors. A secondary objective was to determine the objective response rate to this regimen. Forty-two patients were enrolled and were evaluable for toxicities. Eighteen patients were previously untreated, whereas the rest had received prior treatment with radiation (J. H. Schiller et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 241-248, 1994), chemotherapy (M. J. Kennedy et al., Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 349-356, 1998), or both modalities (J. H. Schiller et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 241-248, 1994). The paclitaxel dose was escalated from 100-135-170-200-225 to 250 mg/m2, whereas i.v. 5-FU and CP doses were fixed at 1.0 g/m2/day continuous infusion and 20 mg/m2/day, respectively, daily for 5 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 5 microg/kg/day) was administered s.c. from day 6, routinely after 250 mg/m2 dose of paclitaxel or after a lower dose of paclitaxel if ANC <500/microl or febrile neutropenia was observed. Patients were treated every 28 days. Plasma and urine samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. In previously untreated patients, the maximally tolerated dose of paclitaxel in the drug regimen was determined to be 170 mg/m2 without and 250 mg/m2 with G-CSF support. At the higher dose level, mucositis and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting. In previously treated patients, these toxicities were observed at all dose levels of paclitaxel > or =135 mg/m2. With increasing doses of paclitaxel, a disproportionate increase in the peak concentrations, as well as the area under plasma concentration time-curve, was seen. This nonlinearity was due to saturable total body clearance and volume of distribution of paclitaxel (P < 0.001). The apparent plasma elimination half-life was unaffected by the dose of paclitaxel. CP and 5-FU had no apparent effect on the metabolism of paclitaxel. Among 32 patients evaluable for response, 22 demonstrated an objective response, including five complete remissions. Therefore, a regimen of 3-h infusion of 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel before CP and FU is tolerable with G-CSF (as above) support in previously untreated patients. The regimen also seems to be highly active against breast and esophageal cancers.
对晚期实体瘤患者进行了一项I期和药理学研究,将紫杉醇作为门诊用药,在每日顺铂(CP)为期5天的疗程及5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)持续输注前进行3小时静脉输注。次要目标是确定该方案的客观缓解率。42例患者入组并可评估毒性。18例患者既往未接受过治疗,其余患者曾接受过放疗(J. H. 席勒等人,《临床肿瘤学杂志》,12: 241 - 248, 1994)、化疗(M. J. 肯尼迪等人,《临床癌症研究》,4: 349 - 356, 1998)或两种治疗方式(J. H. 席勒等人,《临床肿瘤学杂志》,12: 241 - 248, 1994)。紫杉醇剂量从100 - 135 - 170 - 200 - 225逐步递增至250 mg/m²,而静脉输注5-FU和CP的剂量分别固定为1.0 g/m²/天持续输注和20 mg/m²/天,持续5天。从第6天开始皮下注射粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF;5 μg/kg/天),通常在紫杉醇剂量为250 mg/m²后或在较低剂量的紫杉醇后(如果中性粒细胞绝对计数<500/μl或观察到发热性中性粒细胞减少)进行。患者每28天接受一次治疗。收集血浆和尿液样本以测定紫杉醇的药代动力学。在既往未接受过治疗的患者中,该药物方案中紫杉醇的最大耐受剂量在无G-CSF支持时为170 mg/m²,有G-CSF支持时为250 mg/m²。在较高剂量水平时,黏膜炎和血小板减少是剂量限制性毒性。在既往接受过治疗的患者中,在紫杉醇剂量≥135 mg/m²的所有剂量水平均观察到这些毒性。随着紫杉醇剂量的增加,峰值浓度以及血浆浓度时间曲线下面积出现不成比例的增加。这种非线性是由于紫杉醇的全身清除率和分布容积达到饱和所致(P < 0.001)。紫杉醇的表观血浆消除半衰期不受其剂量影响。CP和5-FU对紫杉醇的代谢无明显影响。在32例可评估缓解的患者中,22例表现出客观缓解,包括5例完全缓解。因此,在既往未接受过治疗的患者中,在G-CSF(如上所述)支持下,在CP和FU之前3小时输注250 mg/m²紫杉醇的方案是可耐受的。该方案似乎对乳腺癌和食管癌也具有高度活性。