Erwin E, Miller K D
Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, USA.
J Neurosci. 1999 Aug 15;19(16):7212-29. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-07212.1999.
We explore the hypothesis that binocular simple cells in cat areas 17 and 18 show subregion correspondence, defined as follows: within the region of overlap of the two eye's receptive fields, their ON subregions lie in corresponding locations, as do their OFF subregions. This hypothesis is motivated by a developmental model (Erwin and Miller, 1998) that suggested that simple cells could develop binocularly matched preferred orientations and spatial frequencies by developing subregion correspondence. Binocular organization of simple cell receptive fields is commonly characterized by two quantities: interocular position shift, the distance in visual space between the center positions of the two eye's receptive fields; and interocular phase shift, the difference in the spatial phases of those receptive fields, each measured relative to its center position. The subregion correspondence hypothesis implies that interocular position and phase shifts are linearly related. We compare this hypothesis with the null hypothesis, assumed by most previous models of binocular organization, that the two types of shift are uncorrelated. We demonstrate that the subregion correspondence and null hypotheses are equally consistent with previous measurements of binocular response properties of individual simple cells in the cat and other species and with measurements of the distribution of interocular phase shifts versus preferred orientations or versus interocular position shifts. However, the observed tendency of binocular simple cells in the cat to have "tuned excitatory" disparity tuning curves with preferred disparities tightly clustered around zero (Fischer and Krüger, 1979; Ferster, 1981; LeVay and Voigt, 1988) follows naturally from the subregion correspondence hypothesis but is inconsistent with the null hypothesis. We describe tests that could more conclusively differentiate between the hypotheses. The most straightforward test requires simultaneous determination of the receptive fields of groups of three or more binocular simple cells.
猫17区和18区的双眼简单细胞表现出子区域对应关系,定义如下:在两只眼睛感受野的重叠区域内,它们的ON子区域位于相应位置,OFF子区域也是如此。这个假设是由一个发育模型(Erwin和Miller,1998)提出的,该模型认为简单细胞可以通过发展子区域对应关系来形成双眼匹配的偏好方向和空间频率。简单细胞感受野的双眼组织通常由两个量来表征:眼间位置偏移,即两只眼睛感受野中心位置在视觉空间中的距离;以及眼间相位偏移,即这些感受野空间相位的差异,每个都是相对于其中心位置测量的。子区域对应假设意味着眼间位置和相位偏移是线性相关的。我们将这个假设与大多数先前的双眼组织模型所假设的零假设进行比较,即这两种类型的偏移是不相关的。我们证明,子区域对应假设和零假设同样与先前对猫和其他物种中单个简单细胞双眼反应特性的测量结果以及眼间相位偏移相对于偏好方向或相对于眼间位置偏移的分布测量结果一致。然而,猫双眼简单细胞观察到的具有“调谐兴奋性”视差调谐曲线的趋势,其偏好视差紧密聚集在零附近(Fischer和Krüger,1979;Ferster,1981;LeVay和Voigt,1988),自然地源于子区域对应假设,但与零假设不一致。我们描述了可以更确凿地区分这些假设的测试。最直接的测试需要同时确定三个或更多双眼简单细胞组的感受野。