Palacios A, Taylor L, Haue L, Luftig R B, Visoná K A
Louisiana State University-International Center for Medical Research and Training, Tres Ríos, Costa Rica.
J Med Virol. 1999 Jul;58(3):221-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9071(199907)58:3<221::aid-jmv6>3.0.co;2-s.
Screening and confirmatory low cost reagent tests have been developed for detection of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV). Assays are based on the use of specific synthetic peptides from several structural and non-structural viral proteins. The efficacy of the screening anti-HCV EIA-Spep assay was compared with both Abbott EIA 2.0 (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) and Ortho EIA 2.0 (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, NJ) anti-HCV detection kits and the confirmatory EIA-Cpep assay was compared with the Abbott Matrix anti-HCV confirmation test. In the EIA-Spep, a pool of 3 peptides was added to each well of a microtiter plate. In EIA-Cpep, each well was separately coated with 1 of 4 peptides and 1 recombinant protein. A total of 867 blood donor samples from Costa Rica tested simultaneously with the 3 screening assays yielded the same specificity and negative predictive values of > or =99.9% and 100%, respectively. A comparative study on voluntary blood donor samples from Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador using the 2 anti-HCV confirmatory assays revealed different patterns that are 46% positive, 24% indeterminate, and 30% negative with the EIA-Cpep assay vs. 31% positive, 48% indeterminate, and 21% negative with the Matrix assay. A study of 71 patient samples from Costa Rica showed a higher correlation between initially reactive samples when analyzed by the Abbott and Ortho kits, than when the assay results were compared between the Abbott and EIA-Spep kits; the latter detected 7 and 15 non-reactive samples, respectively. These results could reflect the use of a similar antigen source for the 2 commercial assays. The presence of HCV RNA in a group of 29 samples analyzed was related to the simultaneous reactivity in all 3 screening assays. None of the discordant samples had detectable levels of HCV RNA. Economic difficulties for health care services in the developing countries of Central America have prevented implementation of routine anti-HCV blood donor screening tests. This is likely to be the primary reason for uncontrolled dissemination of HCV, and the lack of identification of potential high risk groups. Alternative low cost reagents developed locally as described in this article could be a useful tool in the control of HCV spread throughout the developing world.
已开发出用于检测抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的低成本筛查和确证试剂检测方法。这些检测方法基于使用来自几种病毒结构和非结构蛋白的特定合成肽。将抗-HCV EIA-Spep筛查检测方法的效能与雅培EIA 2.0(雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州北芝加哥)和奥索EIA 2.0(奥索诊断系统公司,新泽西州拉里坦)抗-HCV检测试剂盒进行了比较,并且将确证性EIA-Cpep检测方法与雅培Matrix抗-HCV确证试验进行了比较。在EIA-Spep中,将一组3种肽添加到微量滴定板的每个孔中。在EIA-Cpep中,每个孔分别用4种肽中的1种和1种重组蛋白包被。来自哥斯达黎加的总共867份献血者样本同时用这3种筛查检测方法进行检测,特异性和阴性预测值分别相同,均≥99.9%和100%。对来自洪都拉斯、尼加拉瓜和萨尔瓦多的自愿献血者样本使用2种抗-HCV确证检测方法进行的一项比较研究显示出不同模式,EIA-Cpep检测方法的结果为46%阳性、24%不确定和30%阴性,而Matrix检测方法的结果为31%阳性、48%不确定和21%阴性。对来自哥斯达黎加的71份患者样本进行的一项研究表明,与雅培和奥索试剂盒分析最初反应性样本时相比,雅培试剂盒和EIA-Spep试剂盒之间比较检测结果时相关性更高;后者分别检测出7份和15份非反应性样本。这些结果可能反映了这2种商业检测方法使用了相似的抗原来源。在分析的一组29份样本中,HCV RNA的存在与所有3种筛查检测方法的同时反应性相关。所有不一致的样本均未检测到可检测水平的HCV RNA。中美洲发展中国家医疗服务面临的经济困难阻碍了常规抗-HCV献血者筛查检测的实施。这可能是HCV不受控制传播以及缺乏识别潜在高危人群的主要原因。本文所述的当地开发的低成本替代试剂可能是控制HCV在整个发展中世界传播的有用工具。