Mittal T K, Halpin S F, Bourne M W, Hourihan M D, Perkins T, Sun Y, Tan S
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Neuroradiology. 1999 Jul;41(7):480-6. doi: 10.1007/s002340050787.
MRI is limited by movement artefact, even with current imagers, when examining a restless or claustrophobic patient. We prospectively analysed the images of 92 patients produced by a single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) pulse sequence and compared them with conventional (FSE) and reduced-time fast spin-echo (RT-FSE) techniques, with regard to lesion detection and movement artefact in brain imaging. Images obtained in each case were independently reviewed and scored for overall diagnosis, number of lesions detected, and movement artefact. FSE showed 1217 lesions, RT-FSE 1137, and SSFSE 1044. This discrepancy arose mainly in patients with multiple sclerosis or small-vessel disease, since with SSFSE we were less able to separate small, adjacent low-contrast lesions than with FSE. Arbitrary movement scores were 36, 25 and zero respectively. There were, however, no clinically significant differences in overall diagnosis between the three techniques. SSFSE thus proved a reliable, fast, accurate method for obtaining T2-weighted images, and may be of particular use in the restless, claustrophobic or obtunded patient.
在检查躁动不安或幽闭恐惧症患者时,即使使用当前的成像设备,磁共振成像(MRI)也会受到运动伪影的限制。我们前瞻性地分析了由单次快速自旋回波(SSFSE)脉冲序列生成的92例患者的图像,并将其与传统的(FSE)和缩短时间的快速自旋回波(RT-FSE)技术在脑成像中的病变检测和运动伪影方面进行了比较。对每种情况下获得的图像进行独立审查,并对总体诊断、检测到的病变数量和运动伪影进行评分。FSE显示1217个病变,RT-FSE显示1137个,SSFSE显示1044个。这种差异主要出现在患有多发性硬化症或小血管疾病的患者中,因为与FSE相比,使用SSFSE时我们更难以区分小的、相邻的低对比度病变。任意运动评分分别为36、25和零。然而,这三种技术在总体诊断上没有临床显著差异。因此,SSFSE被证明是一种可靠、快速、准确的获取T2加权图像的方法,并且可能对躁动不安、幽闭恐惧症或意识不清的患者特别有用。