Paronis C A, Bergman J
Harvard Medical School, Behavioral Pharmacology Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Sep;290(3):1222-9.
Drugs that bind to benzodiazepine recognition sites of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor complexes may function as agonists in some behavioral assays and as antagonists in other behavioral assays. The present studies compared the effects of the benzodiazepines midazolam, flumazenil, bretazenil, Ro 41-7812, and Ro 42-8773 and the beta-carboline, beta-carboline-3-carboxylate-t-butyl ester (beta-CCt) under two different types of schedule-controlled responding in squirrel monkeys. One group of monkeys responded under a fixed-ratio schedule of stimulus-shock termination, and a second group of monkeys responded under a multiple fixed-ratio schedule of food presentation involving suppressed and nonsuppressed behavior. Under the schedule of stimulus-shock termination, midazolam produced dose-related decreases in response rate, and these effects were surmountably antagonized by flumazenil, bretazenil, Ro 41-7812, Ro 42-8773, and beta-CCt. Schild plot analysis of these data revealed the following mean pA(2) values: flumazenil, 7.18; bretazenil, 7.62; Ro 41-7812, 7. 06; Ro 42-8773, 6.95. Apparent pA(2) values were not calculated for beta-CCt because the CL of the slope of the Schild plot included positive values. Under the multiple schedule, midazolam, bretazenil, and Ro 42-8773 dose-dependently increased rates of suppressed responding, whereas flumazenil, Ro 41-7812, and beta-CCt had no significant rate-altering effects. Flumazenil antagonized the antisuppressant effects of midazolam and bretazenil; however, individual variability in these effects prohibited the determination of apparent pA(2) values. These results indicate that in vivo pA(2) values may be determined for benzodiazepine-site ligands. These results further demonstrate that some benzodiazepine-site ligands, e. g., bretazenil and Ro 42-8773, may function as both agonists and as competitive antagonists in vivo.
与γ-氨基丁酸A型受体复合物的苯二氮䓬识别位点结合的药物,在某些行为试验中可能起激动剂作用,而在其他行为试验中则起拮抗剂作用。本研究比较了咪达唑仑、氟马西尼、布瑞唑仑、Ro 41-7812和Ro 42-8773等苯二氮䓬类药物以及β-咔啉、β-咔啉-3-羧酸叔丁酯(β-CCt)在松鼠猴两种不同类型的程序控制反应下的作用。一组猴子在固定比率的刺激-电击终止程序下做出反应,另一组猴子在涉及抑制和非抑制行为的多重固定比率食物呈现程序下做出反应。在刺激-电击终止程序下,咪达唑仑产生与剂量相关的反应率降低,氟马西尼、布瑞唑仑、Ro 41-7812、Ro 42-8773和β-CCt可克服这些作用。对这些数据进行的Schild图分析显示了以下平均pA(2)值:氟马西尼,7.18;布瑞唑仑,7.62;Ro 41-7812,7.06;Ro 42-8773,6.95。未计算β-CCt的表观pA(2)值,因为Schild图斜率的CL包含正值。在多重程序下,咪达唑仑、布瑞唑仑和Ro 42-8773剂量依赖性地增加抑制反应的速率,而氟马西尼、Ro 41-7812和β-CCt对速率无显著改变作用。氟马西尼拮抗咪达唑仑和布瑞唑仑的抗抑制作用;然而,这些作用的个体差异使得无法确定表观pA(2)值。这些结果表明,可以确定苯二氮䓬位点配体的体内pA(2)值。这些结果进一步证明,一些苯二氮䓬位点配体,如布瑞唑仑和Ro 42-8773,在体内可能既起激动剂作用又起竞争性拮抗剂作用。