Herrero C J, García-Palomero E, Pintado A J, García A G, Montiel C
Departamento de Farmacología e Instituto de Farmacología Teófilo Hernando, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Arzobispo Morcillo, Spain.
Br J Pharmacol. 1999 Jul;127(6):1375-87. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702692.
Rat alpha3beta4 or alpha7 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and the effects of various toxins and non-toxin Ca2+ channel blockers studied. Nicotinic AChR currents were elicited by 1 s pulses of dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP, 100 microM) applied at regular intervals. The N/P/Q-type Ca2+ channel blocker omega-conotoxin MVIIC inhibited alpha3beta4 currents with an IC50 of 1.3 microM; the blockade was non-competitive and reversible. The alpha7 currents were unaffected. At 1 microM, omega-conotoxin GVIA (N-type Ca2+ channel blocker) inhibited by 24 and 20% alpha3beta4 and alpha7 currents, respectively. At 1 microM, omega-agatoxin IVA (a P/Q-type Ca2+ channel blocker) did not affect alpha7 currents and inhibited alpha3beta4 currents by only 15%. L-type Ca2+ channel blockers furnidipine, verapamil and, particularly, diltiazem exhibited a preferential blocking activity on alpha3beta4 nicotinic AChRs. The mechanism of alpha3beta4 currents blockade by omega-conotoxins and diltiazem differed in the following aspects: (i) the onset and reversal of the blockade was faster for toxins; (ii) the blockade by the peptides was voltage-dependent, while that exerted by diltiazem was not; (iii) diltiazem promoted the inactivation of the current while omega-toxins did not. These data show that, at concentrations currently employed as Ca2+ channel blockers, some of these compounds also inhibit certain subtypes of nicotinic AChR currents. Our data calls for caution when interpreting many of the results obtained in neurons and other cell types, where nicotinic receptor and Ca2+ channels coexist.
大鼠α3β4或α7神经元烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体(AChRs)在非洲爪蟾卵母细胞中表达,并研究了各种毒素和非毒素Ca2+通道阻滞剂的作用。烟碱型AChR电流由以固定间隔施加的1 s二甲基苯基哌嗪(DMPP,100 μM)脉冲引发。N/P/Q型Ca2+通道阻滞剂ω-芋螺毒素MVIIC以1.3 μM的IC50抑制α3β4电流;该阻断是非竞争性且可逆的。α7电流不受影响。在1 μM时,ω-芋螺毒素GVIA(N型Ca2+通道阻滞剂)分别抑制α3β4和α7电流24%和20%。在1 μM时,ω-阿加毒素IVA(一种P/Q型Ca2+通道阻滞剂)不影响α7电流,仅抑制α3β4电流15%。L型Ca2+通道阻滞剂福尼地平、维拉帕米,尤其是地尔硫卓对α3β4烟碱型AChRs表现出优先阻断活性。ω-芋螺毒素和地尔硫卓对α3β4电流的阻断机制在以下方面有所不同:(i)毒素的阻断起效和逆转更快;(ii)肽类的阻断是电压依赖性的,而地尔硫卓的阻断不是;(iii)地尔硫卓促进电流失活,而ω-毒素则不。这些数据表明,在目前用作Ca2+通道阻滞剂的浓度下,其中一些化合物也抑制某些亚型的烟碱型AChR电流。我们的数据表明,在解释在烟碱受体和Ca2+通道共存的神经元和其他细胞类型中获得的许多结果时需要谨慎。