Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Aug;66(2):152-65. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)90053-X.
To examine the problems of establishing dose-effect and concentration-effect relationships of antidepressant therapy with clomipramine.
This randomized double-blind study compared five fixed doses of clomipramine hydrochloride: 25, 50, 75, 125, and 200 mg/day in hospitalized or day patients at nine clinical centers in Denmark. A 1-week washout period was followed by 6 weeks of active treatment and weekly depression ratings. In total, 151 patients (100 women and 51 men) with major depression scoring > or =18 on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) or > or =9 on the Hamilton Depression subscale (HDSS) before and after the washout period were randomized. The treatment groups (n = 29 to 32) were well balanced with respect to sex, age, and depression rating. Serum concentrations of clomipramine plus metabolites were measured at weekly intervals. A sparteine test was performed before and during drug treatment.
There was pronounced interpatient variability in response and kinetics at each dose. Drop-outs attributable to adverse events increased with rising doses, whereas drop-outs caused by worsening or lack of effect or nonresponse declined with increasing dose. Completer analyses showed a moderate and statistically significant relationship between depression rating and dose at all ratings after 1 to 6 weeks of treatment (trend analysis). HDS items representing core symptoms of depression showed a particularly consistent dose-effect relationship. Early sustained response occurred more frequently with the two highest doses. Serum levels of clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine showed weak correlation with depression ratings (Rs = -0.18 to -0.27; P < .05 to P < .01). A few blood pressure measurements and a few typical side-effect ratings showed a statistically significant dose-effect and concentration-effect relationship. Serum concentration of clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine showed a pronounced disproportionate increase with increasing dose. Clomipramine inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion CYP2D6 (sparteine oxidation).
The dose-effect curves, indicating the probability of a certain outcome at a given dose, were flat and overlapping suggesting a narrow therapeutic range. This pattern is similar to that observed with newer antidepressants.
探讨确立氯米帕明抗抑郁治疗的剂量效应和浓度效应关系所存在的问题。
这项随机双盲研究在丹麦九个临床中心,对住院患者或日间患者比较了五种固定剂量的盐酸氯米帕明:25、50、75、125和200毫克/天。经过1周的洗脱期后,进行6周的积极治疗并每周进行抑郁评分。共有151例患者(100名女性和51名男性),在洗脱期前后汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDS)评分≥18分或汉密尔顿抑郁分量表(HDSS)评分≥9分,这些患者被随机分组。各治疗组(n = 29至32)在性别、年龄和抑郁评分方面均衡良好。每周测定氯米帕明及其代谢产物的血清浓度。在药物治疗前和治疗期间进行了司巴丁试验。
各剂量下患者的反应和动力学均存在明显的个体差异。因不良事件导致的脱落率随剂量增加而升高,而因病情恶化、疗效不佳或无反应导致的脱落率随剂量增加而下降。完成者分析显示,治疗1至6周后,在所有评分中抑郁评分与剂量之间存在中度且具有统计学意义的关系(趋势分析)。代表抑郁核心症状的HDS项目显示出特别一致的剂量效应关系。两种最高剂量时早期持续反应更频繁出现。氯米帕明和去甲氯米帕明的血清水平与抑郁评分呈弱相关性(Rs = -0.18至-0.27;P <.05至P <.01)。少数血压测量值和少数典型副作用评分显示出具有统计学意义的剂量效应和浓度效应关系。氯米帕明和去甲氯米帕明的血清浓度随剂量增加呈明显不成比例的升高。氯米帕明以剂量依赖性方式抑制CYP2D6(司巴丁氧化)。
剂量效应曲线表明在给定剂量下出现特定结果的概率,曲线较为平坦且相互重叠,提示治疗范围较窄。这种模式与新型抗抑郁药所观察到的相似。