Suppr超能文献

泼尼松龙和硫唑嘌呤免疫抑制是否会改变特发性膜性肾病的病程?

Does immunosuppression with prednisolone and azathioprine alter the progression of idiopathic membranous nephropathy?

作者信息

Ahuja M, Goumenos D, Shortland J R, Gerakis A, Brown C B

机构信息

Department of Histopathology, Northern General Hospital National Health Service Trust, Sheffield, UK, Greece.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Sep;34(3):521-9. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70081-8.

Abstract

The role of immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains controversial. The effect of treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and biopsy-proven IMN from a single center (Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield, UK) is described. In this retrospective study, 58 patients with IMN and nephrotic-range proteinuria were followed up for 4 years. Thirty-eight patients were treated with prednisolone (1 mg/kg body weight/d) and azathioprine (2 mg/kg body weight/d) orally for a median period of 26 months (range, 6 to 48 months). Twenty patients received no specific treatment for IMN and served as a control group. Clinical, biochemical, and histopathologic features at presentation were similar between the groups. Renal function (RF), measured by serum creatinine (Scr) level, deteriorated in both treated and control groups during the follow-up period. The median initial and final Scr levels (at the end of follow-up) in the treated group were 1.6 and 2. 1 mg/dL, respectively, and in the control group were 1.3 and 1.7 m/dL, respectively (P = not significant). Neither the rate of RF decline (measured by the slope of reciprocal of Scr against time) nor the proportion of patients with deteriorating RF differed significantly between the groups (37%, treated group; 30%, control group). A significant reduction in proteinuria was observed in both groups (P < 0.01, either group). Also, the rate of remission of nephrotic-range proteinuria was not significantly different between groups (55%, treated group; 65%, control group). The only prognostic factor that correlated with RF outcome (expressed by final Scr level) in a given patient was the mean proteinuria during follow-up in either group (r = 0.493; P < 0.01, treated group; r = 0.651; P < 0.01, control group). Adverse effects of immunosuppressive treatment were observed in nine patients (24%). These were serious in four patients (10%) and included squamous cell carcinoma (two patients), bacterial meningitis (one patient), and septicemia (one patient). In conclusion, treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine for patients with IMN did not show significant beneficial effects on the progression of disease. Furthermore, this treatment was associated with frequent and serious adverse effects.

摘要

免疫抑制药物在特发性膜性肾病(IMN)治疗中的作用仍存在争议。本文描述了在英国谢菲尔德一家单一中心(谢菲尔德肾脏研究所),使用泼尼松龙和硫唑嘌呤治疗肾病范围蛋白尿且经活检证实为IMN患者的疗效。在这项回顾性研究中,58例IMN和肾病范围蛋白尿患者接受了4年的随访。38例患者口服泼尼松龙(1mg/kg体重/天)和硫唑嘌呤(2mg/kg体重/天),中位治疗时间为26个月(范围6至48个月)。20例患者未接受IMN的特异性治疗,作为对照组。两组患者就诊时的临床、生化和组织病理学特征相似。在随访期间,治疗组和对照组的肾功能(RF)均以血清肌酐(Scr)水平衡量出现恶化。治疗组Scr的初始和最终中位水平(随访结束时)分别为1.6和2.1mg/dL,对照组分别为1.3和1.7mg/dL(P无显著性差异)。两组间RF下降率(以Scr倒数对时间的斜率衡量)以及RF恶化患者比例均无显著差异(治疗组37%;对照组30%)。两组蛋白尿均显著减少(P<0.01,任何一组)。此外,肾病范围蛋白尿的缓解率在两组间无显著差异(治疗组55%;对照组65%)。在任一给定患者中,与RF结局(以最终Scr水平表示)相关的唯一预后因素是随访期间的平均蛋白尿(r = 0.493;P<0.01,治疗组;r = 0.651;P<0.01,对照组)。9例患者(24%)出现免疫抑制治疗的不良反应。其中4例(10%)较为严重,包括鳞状细胞癌(2例)、细菌性脑膜炎(1例)和败血症(1例)。总之,泼尼松龙和硫唑嘌呤治疗IMN患者对疾病进展未显示出显著有益效果。此外,该治疗伴有频繁且严重的不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验