Li C Y, Sung F C
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Hsinchuang, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, ROC.
Occup Med (Lond). 1999 May;49(4):225-9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/49.4.225.
This review article aims to anatomize sources of the healthy worker effect (HWE) and to summarize advantages and limitations of several approaches frequently proposed to eliminate the HWE. Although the HWE is frequently addressed in the context of selection bias, our review suggests that the selection of occupational cohorts with advantageous health status would preferably be addressed as a source of confounding biases. The authors also conclude that the exclusion of unhealthy workers at employment and the study of active workers are the two main sources of HWE, and that the use of the general population as a comparison group in occupational epidemiology should be avoided if possible. The authors encourage investigators to make distinctions between the underlying factors related to the use of the general population as the comparison group in occupational epidemiology.
这篇综述文章旨在剖析健康工人效应(HWE)的来源,并总结几种常被提出用于消除HWE的方法的优缺点。尽管HWE在选择偏倚的背景下经常被提及,但我们的综述表明,选择健康状况有利的职业队列最好被视为混杂偏倚的一个来源。作者还得出结论,就业时排除不健康工人以及对在职工人进行研究是HWE的两个主要来源,并且在职业流行病学中应尽可能避免将一般人群用作对照组。作者鼓励研究人员区分与在职业流行病学中使用一般人群作为对照组相关的潜在因素。