Pereira A C, Basting R T, Pinelli C, de Castro Meneghim M, Werner C W
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba-UNICAMP, Departamento de Odontologia Social, SP, Brazil.
Am J Dent. 1999 Apr;12(2):62-4.
To assess the retention and caries incidence of Vitremer (resin-modified glass ionomer) and Ketac-bond (conventional glass ionomer cement), used as occlusal sealants, after 6 and 12 months placement.
The sample consisted of 200 school children, 6-8 years old with sound and unsealed permanent first molars. They were divided into three groups: (a) control group (n = 432 teeth); (b) Vitremer experimental group (n = 200 teeth), and (c) Ketac-Bond experimental group (n = 200 teeth). In the experimental groups, Vitremer was applied on teeth 16 and 46 whereas Ketac-Bond was applied on 26 and 36.
The total retention rates for Vitremer after 6 and 12 months were 59% and 36%, respectively. For Ketac-Bond, the total retention rates were 24% and 15%, respectively. No dental caries was recorded during the 12 months for both experimental groups. When effectiveness was measured by sealant retention, there was a significant difference between Vitremer and Ketac-Bond after 6 (P < 0.01) and 12 months (P < 0.05). When effectiveness was measured by caries prevention, no significant difference was found between experimental groups, even when the sealants were partially or totally lost. There was no development of carious lesions after 1-year placement of sealants, but there was a significant difference between experimental and control groups (P < 0.01).
评估用作咬合面封闭剂的Vitremer(树脂改性玻璃离子体)和Ketac-bond(传统玻璃离子水门汀)在放置6个月和12个月后的保留率及龋病发生率。
样本包括200名6 - 8岁的学童,他们的恒牙第一磨牙完好且未封闭。将他们分为三组:(a)对照组(n = 432颗牙);(b)Vitremer实验组(n = 200颗牙),以及(c)Ketac-Bond实验组(n = 200颗牙)。在实验组中,Vitremer应用于16和46号牙,而Ketac-Bond应用于26和36号牙。
Vitremer在6个月和12个月后的总保留率分别为59%和36%。对于Ketac-Bond,总保留率分别为24%和15%。在12个月期间,两个实验组均未记录到龋齿。当通过封闭剂保留率来衡量有效性时,Vitremer和Ketac-Bond在6个月(P < 0.01)和12个月(P < 0.05)后存在显著差异。当通过预防龋齿来衡量有效性时,即使封闭剂部分或全部脱落,实验组之间也未发现显著差异。在放置封闭剂1年后,未出现龋损,但实验组和对照组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。