Palarea R E, Zona M A, Lane J C, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(3):269-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<269::aid-bsl346>3.0.co;2-6.
Although previous studies of forensic and law enforcement stalking populations (Harmon, Rosner, & Owens, 1995; Meloy & Gothard, 1995; Zona, Sharma, & Lane, 1993) agree that the degree of intimacy of the victim-suspect relationship is an important factor in stalking cases, they have not conducted in-depth analyses of this variable. This study compared 223 intimate (n=135) and non-intimate (n=88) stalking cases managed by the Los Angeles Police Department's Threat Management Unit. A path analysis revealed a significant relationship between the stalkers' intimate versus non-intimate status and violence committed toward persons and property. This relationship was positively influenced by the suspect's level of proximity to the victim and threats toward the victim and property, but not influenced by suspect's criminal, psychiatric, and domestic violence histories. Overall, intimate relationship stalkers used more dangerous stalking behaviors than non-intimate relationship stalkers. Risk factors for assessing dangerousness of stalkers are discussed.
尽管之前关于法医和执法跟踪人群的研究(哈蒙、罗斯纳和欧文斯,1995年;梅洛和戈瑟德,1995年;佐纳、沙尔马和莱恩,1993年)一致认为,受害者与嫌疑人关系的亲密程度是跟踪案件中的一个重要因素,但他们并未对这一变量进行深入分析。本研究比较了洛杉矶警察局威胁管理部门处理的223起亲密关系(n = 135)和非亲密关系(n = 88)跟踪案件。路径分析显示,跟踪者的亲密关系与非亲密关系状态与针对人员和财产的暴力行为之间存在显著关系。这种关系受到嫌疑人与受害者的接近程度以及对受害者和财产的威胁的正向影响,但不受嫌疑人的犯罪、精神病史和家庭暴力史的影响。总体而言,亲密关系跟踪者比非亲密关系跟踪者使用更危险的跟踪行为。文中还讨论了评估跟踪者危险性的风险因素。