Suppr超能文献

输注方案可改善重症监护病房肠内管饲的供给情况。

Infusion protocol improves delivery of enteral tube feeding in the critical care unit.

作者信息

Spain D A, McClave S A, Sexton L K, Adams J L, Blanford B S, Sullins M E, Owens N A, Snider H L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1999 Sep-Oct;23(5):288-92. doi: 10.1177/0148607199023005288.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous factors may impede the delivery of enteral tube feedings (ETF) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We designed a prospective study to determine whether the use of an infusion protocol could improve the delivery of ETF in the ICU.

METHODS

In a prior prospective study, we monitored all patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) or cardiac care unit (CCU) who were made nil per os and placed on ETF (control group). We found that critically ill patients received only 52% of their goal calories, primarily due to physician underordering (66% of goal), frequent cessations of ETF (22% of the time), and slow advancement (14% at goal by 72 hours). Based on these findings, we developed an ETF protocol that incorporated standardized physician ordering and nursing procedures, rapid advancement, and limited ETF interruption. After extensive educational sessions, the ETF protocol was begun. Again, all patients admitted to the MICU or CCU who were made nil per os and placed on ETF were prospectively followed (protocol group).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients in the protocol group were followed during 312 days of ETF and compared with the control group (44 patients with 339 days of ETF). Despite efforts by the nutritional support team, the infusion protocol was used in only 18 patients (58%). The main reasons for noncompliance with the protocol were physician preference and system failure (ETF order sheet not placed in chart). When used, the infusion protocol improved physician ordering (control 66% of goal volume, noncompliant 68%, compliant 82%, p < .05); delivery of calories (control 52% of goal, noncompliant 55%, compliant 68%, p < .05); and advancement of ETF (control 14% at goal by 72 hours, noncompliant 31%, compliant 56%, p < .05). Although significant reduction in ETF cessation due to nursing care was noted, it represented only a fraction of the total time ETF were stopped. Cessation due to residual volumes, patient tolerance, and procedure continued to be a frequent occurrence and was often avoidable.

CONCLUSIONS

An evidence-based infusion protocol improved the delivery of ETF in the ICU, primarily because of better physician ordering and more rapid advancement. The nursing staff rapidly assimilated these changes. However, physicians' reluctance to use the protocol limited its efficacy and will need continued educational efforts.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房(ICU)中,多种因素可能会妨碍肠内管饲(ETF)的实施。我们设计了一项前瞻性研究,以确定使用输注方案是否能改善ICU中ETF的实施情况。

方法

在之前的一项前瞻性研究中,我们对所有入住内科重症监护病房(MICU)或心脏监护病房(CCU)且禁食并接受ETF的患者进行了监测(对照组)。我们发现,重症患者仅获得了其目标热量的52%,主要原因是医生医嘱量不足(占目标量的66%)、ETF频繁中断(占总时间的22%)以及推进缓慢(72小时时达到目标量的14%)。基于这些发现,我们制定了一项ETF方案,该方案纳入了标准化的医生医嘱和护理程序、快速推进以及有限的ETF中断措施。经过广泛的培训课程后,开始实施ETF方案。同样,对所有入住MICU或CCU且禁食并接受ETF的患者进行前瞻性随访(方案组)。

结果

方案组的31例患者在312天的ETF期间接受了随访,并与对照组(44例患者,339天的ETF)进行了比较。尽管营养支持团队做出了努力,但输注方案仅在18例患者(58%)中得到使用。不遵守该方案的主要原因是医生的偏好和系统故障(ETF医嘱单未放入病历中)。当使用该方案时,输注方案改善了医生的医嘱(对照组为目标量的66%,不遵守组为68%,遵守组为82%,p < 0.05);热量的输送(对照组为目标量的52%,不遵守组为55%,遵守组为68%,p < 0.05);以及ETF的推进(对照组72小时时达到目标量的14%,不遵守组为31%,遵守组为56%,p < 0.05)。尽管因护理导致的ETF中断显著减少,但这仅占ETF总中断时间的一小部分。由于残余量、患者耐受性和操作导致的中断仍然经常发生,且往往是可以避免的。

结论

基于证据的输注方案改善了ICU中ETF的实施情况,主要是因为医生医嘱更好且推进更快。护理人员迅速吸收了这些变化。然而,医生不愿使用该方案限制了其效果,需要持续进行教育努力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验