Suppr超能文献

鲍曼层和基质性角膜营养不良的共聚焦显微镜检查

Confocal microscopy in Bowman and stromal corneal dystrophies.

作者信息

Werner L P, Werner L, Dighiero P, Legeais J M, Renard G

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1999 Sep;106(9):1697-704. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90358-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use confocal microscopy to demonstrate the similarity among three autosomal-dominant corneal dystrophies and the diversity of the deposit patterns within a single dystrophy.

DESIGN

A prospective, comparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients (40 eyes) from 10 families suffering from Bowman or stromal dystrophy agreed to take part: 3 with Reis-Bückler dystrophy, 12 with granular dystrophy, and 5 with lattice type-I dystrophy. Of these, nine had recurrence in their grafts or after phototherapeutic keratectomy before the confocal examination. The confocal images of affected corneas were compared with those of ten normal control eyes (ten subjects).

INTERVENTION

All patients were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Confocal microscopy was performed with Achroplan 40x/numeric aperture (NA) = 0.75 and 63x/NA = 0.9 water immersion objectives. Image analysis was used to identify the corneal epithelial and stromal deposits correlated with each disorder.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Selected images of the corneal layers were evaluated qualitatively for the size, shape, light scattering, and reflection of the deposits.

RESULTS

Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showed stromal involvement in all affected eyes. Confocal microscopy identified epithelial deposits in 30% of the eyes and stromal deposits in all eyes. The deposits within the epithelium were revealed more clearly with the 63x/NA = 0.9 objective (higher numeric aperture). Some of the confocal findings near the Bowman layer were common for all three dystrophies. Normal control eyes showed no epithelial or stromal deposits, either by biomicroscopy or confocal microscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Confocal microscopy provides an in vivo evaluation of the deposits in the cornea, with a higher resolution than biomicroscopy. The confocal findings common to the three dystrophies may agree with previous hypotheses of the same genetic origin. It may be a useful adjunct to slit-lamp biomicroscopy, particularly when histopathologic studies cannot be performed.

摘要

目的

运用共聚焦显微镜来证明三种常染色体显性遗传性角膜营养不良之间的相似性以及单一营养不良中沉积物模式的多样性。

设计

一项前瞻性、对比性病例系列研究。

参与者

来自10个家庭的20名患者(40只眼),患有Bowman层或基质营养不良,同意参与研究:3例为Reis-Bückler营养不良,12例为颗粒状营养不良,5例为I型格子状营养不良。其中,9例在共聚焦检查前其移植片或接受光动力角膜切削术后出现复发。将患眼角膜的共聚焦图像与10只正常对照眼(10名受试者)的图像进行比较。

干预措施

所有患者均接受裂隙灯生物显微镜检查。使用Achroplan 40x/数值孔径(NA)=0.75和63x/NA = 0.9的水浸物镜进行共聚焦显微镜检查。采用图像分析来识别与每种疾病相关的角膜上皮和基质沉积物。

主要观察指标

对角膜各层的选定图像进行定性评估,观察沉积物的大小、形状、光散射和反射情况。

结果

裂隙灯生物显微镜检查显示所有患眼的基质均受累。共聚焦显微镜检查发现30%的患眼有上皮沉积物,所有患眼均有基质沉积物。使用63x/NA = 0.9物镜(较高数值孔径)时,上皮内的沉积物显示得更清晰。Bowman层附近的一些共聚焦检查结果在所有三种营养不良中均常见。正常对照眼无论是通过生物显微镜检查还是共聚焦显微镜检查均未发现上皮或基质沉积物。

结论

共聚焦显微镜可对角膜沉积物进行活体评估,分辨率高于生物显微镜。三种营养不良共有的共聚焦检查结果可能与先前关于相同遗传起源的假设相符。它可能是裂隙灯生物显微镜检查的有用辅助手段,尤其是在无法进行组织病理学研究时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验