Torp-Pedersen C, Møller M, Bloch-Thomsen P E, Køber L, Sandøe E, Egstrup K, Agner E, Carlsen J, Videbaek J, Marchant B, Camm A J
Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 16;341(12):857-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909163411201.
Atrial fibrillation occurs frequently in patients with congestive heart failure and commonly results in clinical deterioration and hospitalization. Sinus rhythm may be maintained with antiarrhythmic drugs, but some of these drugs increase the risk of death.
We studied 1518 patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction at 34 Danish hospitals. We randomly assigned 762 patients to receive dofetilide, a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent, and 756 to receive placebo in a double-blind study. Treatment was initiated in the hospital and included three days of cardiac monitoring and dose adjustment. The primary end point was death from any cause.
During a median follow-up of 18 months, 311 patients in the dofetilide group (41 percent) and 317 patients in the placebo group (42 percent) died (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.11). Treatment with dofetilide significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure (risk ratio, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.89). Dofetilide was effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. After one month, 22 of 190 patients with atrial fibrillation at base line (12 percent) had sinus rhythm restored with dofetilide, as compared with only 3 of 201 patients (1 percent) given placebo. Once sinus rhythm was restored, dofetilide was significantly more effective than placebo in maintaining sinus rhythm (hazard ratio for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, 0.35; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.57; P<0.001). There were 25 cases of torsade de pointes in the dofetilide group (3.3 percent) as compared with none in the placebo group.
In patients with congestive heart failure and reduced left ventricular function, dofetilide was effective in converting atrial fibrillation, preventing its recurrence, and reducing the risk of hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Dofetilide had no effect on mortality.
心房颤动在充血性心力衰竭患者中频繁发生,通常会导致临床病情恶化和住院治疗。抗心律失常药物可维持窦性心律,但其中一些药物会增加死亡风险。
我们在丹麦的34家医院对1518例有症状的充血性心力衰竭和严重左心室功能不全患者进行了研究。在一项双盲研究中,我们将762例患者随机分配接受新型III类抗心律失常药物多非利特治疗,756例患者接受安慰剂治疗。治疗在医院开始,包括为期三天的心脏监测和剂量调整。主要终点是任何原因导致的死亡。
在中位随访18个月期间,多非利特组有311例患者(41%)死亡,安慰剂组有317例患者(42%)死亡(风险比为0.95;95%置信区间为0.81至1.11)。多非利特治疗显著降低了因充血性心力衰竭恶化而住院的风险(风险比为0.75;95%置信区间为0.63至0.89)。多非利特在将心房颤动转为窦性心律方面有效。一个月后,基线时有心房颤动的190例患者中,22例(12%)使用多非利特恢复了窦性心律,而给予安慰剂的201例患者中只有3例(1%)恢复了窦性心律。一旦恢复窦性心律,多非利特在维持窦性心律方面显著比安慰剂更有效(心房颤动复发的风险比为0.35;95%置信区间为0.22至0.57;P<0.001)。多非利特组有25例尖端扭转型室速(3.3%),而安慰剂组无此情况。
在充血性心力衰竭和左心室功能降低的患者中,多非利特在转复心房颤动、预防其复发以及降低因心力衰竭恶化而住院的风险方面有效。多非利特对死亡率无影响。