Narayan K, Crane C H, Kleid S, Hughes P G, Peters L J
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Head Neck. 1999 Oct;21(7):606-13. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199910)21:7<606::aid-hed4>3.0.co;2-g.
Management of patients with head and neck carcinoma and advanced nodal disease is controversial. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of definitive radiotherapy followed by planned neck dissection in patients with bulky neck disease.
The records of 52 patients who were treated between 1989 and 1995 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute with a planned neck dissection after radical radiotherapy were reviewed. All had advanced neck disease with one or more nodes >/=3 cm in maximum diameter, 94% being staged N2-3. The most common primary site was the oropharynx (56%). Sixty percent of patients had either T2 or T3 primaries and all were AJCC stage IV. Treatment consisted of high-dose radiotherapy to the primary and involved neck sites using various fractionation protocols followed by radical or modified radical neck dissection after confirmation of a complete response at the primary site. The median follow-up for living patients was 58 months (range 32-97).
There were nine regional failures, of which three were outside the dissected neck, yielding a 5-year actuarial overall neck control rate of 83% and an in-field control rate of 88%. In-field control rates by neck stage were N1 3/3; N2 31/35; N3 11/13 and NX 1/1. There was only one in-field failure among 28 patients who had pathologically negative neck specimens compared with five in 24 patients with morphologic evidence of residual disease. Of the 24 patients with pathologically positive necks, 5 were long-term survivors and were probably cured by their surgery. Another 4 died of intercurrent disease without documented recurrence of their head and neck cancer. Ten patients recurred at their primary sites (5-year actuarial control 79%) and 8 developed distant metastases (5-year actuarial rate 20%). A total of 21 patients failed at one or more sites and none was salvaged. Five-year actuarial disease-free survival was 57% and overall survival 38%. Nine patients (17%) sustained significant complications following neck dissection.
In patients with advanced neck disease who are treated primarily with radical radiotherapy, planned neck dissection provides excellent regional control and appears to cure a subset of patients. However, routine neck dissection adds significant morbidity to treatment and should ideally be avoided in those patients in whom surgery is either unnecessary (no residual tumor) or futile (unsalvageable disease recurrence outside the dissected neck). Based on our analysis and other recently reported series, we now recommend observing patients who have a complete response to high-dose radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy). The ability of PET imaging to detect residual viable tumor in the head and neck or at distant sites is under investigation.
头颈部癌伴晚期淋巴结疾病患者的治疗存在争议。本分析的目的是评估对颈部肿物较大的患者进行根治性放疗后计划性颈清扫术的疗效和毒性。
回顾了1989年至1995年间在彼得·麦卡勒姆癌症研究所接受根治性放疗后计划性颈清扫术的52例患者的记录。所有患者均有晚期颈部疾病,有一个或多个最大直径≥3 cm的淋巴结,94%为N2 - 3期。最常见的原发部位是口咽(56%)。60%的患者原发灶为T2或T3期,均为美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)IV期。治疗包括使用不同的分割方案对原发灶和受累颈部区域进行高剂量放疗,在确认原发灶完全缓解后进行根治性或改良根治性颈清扫术。存活患者的中位随访时间为58个月(范围32 - 97个月)。
有9例区域复发,其中3例在清扫颈部以外,5年实际总颈部控制率为83%,野内控制率为88%。按颈部分期的野内控制率为:N1期3/3;N2期31/35;N3期11/13;NX期1/1。在28例颈部标本病理阴性的患者中只有1例野内复发,而在24例有残留疾病形态学证据的患者中有5例复发。在24例颈部病理阳性的患者中,5例为长期存活者,可能通过手术治愈。另外4例死于并发疾病,无头颈癌复发记录。10例患者原发灶复发(5年实际控制率79%),8例发生远处转移(5年实际发生率20%)。共有21例患者在一个或多个部位复发,无一例得到挽救。5年实际无病生存率为57%,总生存率为38%。9例患者(17%)在颈清扫术后出现严重并发症。
对于主要接受根治性放疗的晚期颈部疾病患者,计划性颈清扫术可提供良好的区域控制,且似乎能治愈一部分患者。然而,常规颈清扫术会增加治疗的显著发病率,对于那些手术不必要(无残留肿瘤)或无效(清扫颈部以外不可挽救的疾病复发)的患者,理想情况下应避免。基于我们的分析和其他近期报道的系列研究,我们现在建议对高剂量放疗(±化疗)有完全缓解的患者进行观察。正电子发射断层显像(PET)成像检测头颈部或远处残留存活肿瘤的能力正在研究中。