Suppr超能文献

一项关于心肺复苏和预立医疗指示的多媒体干预措施。

A multimedia intervention on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advance directives.

作者信息

Yamada R, Galecki A T, Goold S D, Hogikyan R V

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep;14(9):559-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11208.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of a multimedia educational intervention about advance directives (ADs) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on the knowledge, attitude and activity toward ADs and life-sustaining treatments of elderly veterans.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled, single blind study of educational interventions.

SETTING

General medicine clinic of a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC).

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred seventeen Veterans, 70 years of age or older, deemed able to make medical care decisions.

INTERVENTION

The control group (n = 55) received a handout about ADs in use at the VAMC. The experimental group (n = 62) received the same handout, with an additional handout describing procedural aspects and outcomes of CPR, and they watched a videotape about ADs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients' attitudes and actions toward ADs, CPR and life-sustaining treatments were recorded before the intervention, after it, and 2 to 4 weeks after the intervention through self-administered questionnaires. Only 27.8% of subjects stated that they knew what an AD is in the preintervention questionnaire. This proportion improved in both the experimental and control (87.2% experimental, 52.5% control) subject groups, but stated knowledge of what an AD is was higher in the experimental group (odds ratio = 6.18, p <.001) and this effect, although diminished, persisted in the follow-up questionnaire (OR = 3.92, p =. 003). Prior to any intervention, 15% of subjects correctly estimated the likelihood of survival after CPR. This improved after the intervention in the experimental group (OR = 4.27, p =.004), but did not persist at follow-up. In the postintervention questionnaire, few subjects in either group stated that they discussed CPR or ADs with their physician on that day (OR = 0.97, p = NS).

CONCLUSION

We developed a convenient means of educating elderly male patients regarding CPR and advance directives that improved short-term knowledge but did not stimulate advance care planning.

摘要

目的

评估一项关于预立医疗指示(ADs)和心肺复苏(CPR)的多媒体教育干预措施对老年退伍军人关于ADs及维持生命治疗的知识、态度和行为的影响。

设计

教育干预的前瞻性随机对照单盲研究。

地点

一所大学附属退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)的普通内科诊所。

参与者

117名70岁及以上、被认为有能力做出医疗护理决策的退伍军人。

干预措施

对照组(n = 55)收到一份VAMC正在使用的关于ADs的资料。实验组(n = 62)收到相同的资料,外加一份描述CPR程序方面和结果的资料,并观看了一段关于ADs的录像带。

测量指标及主要结果

通过自行填写问卷,在干预前、干预后以及干预后2至4周记录患者对ADs、CPR和维持生命治疗的态度及行为。干预前问卷中,只有27.8%的受试者表示知道什么是ADs。实验组和对照组(实验组87.2%,对照组52.5%)这一比例均有所提高,但实验组对ADs的知晓情况更高(优势比 = 6.18,p <.001),且这一效果虽有所减弱,但在随访问卷中仍然存在(OR = 3.92,p =.003)。在任何干预之前,15%的受试者正确估计了CPR后的存活可能性。干预后实验组这一情况有所改善(OR = 4.27,p =.004),但随访时未持续。在干预后问卷中,两组中很少有受试者表示当天与医生讨论过CPR或ADs(OR = 0.97,p = 无显著差异)。

结论

我们开发了一种方便的方法来教育老年男性患者关于CPR和预立医疗指示,该方法改善了短期知识,但未促进预先护理计划。

相似文献

1
A multimedia intervention on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advance directives.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep;14(9):559-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11208.x.
2
Patients' understanding of advance directives and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
J Crit Care. 2005 Mar;20(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.11.002.
5
Elderly outpatients' understanding of a physician-initiated advance directive discussion.
Arch Fam Med. 1994 Dec;3(12):1057-63. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.12.1057.
6
Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives.
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jul;13(7):447-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00133.x.
9
Correlates of advance directive treatment preferences among community-dwelling older people with chronic diseases.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2019 Jun;14(2):e12229. doi: 10.1111/opn.12229. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun;8(6):295-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02600139.

引用本文的文献

3
Communication Tools for End-of-Life Decision-Making in Ambulatory Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0150671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150671. eCollection 2016.
4
Death in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Information and Communication Technologies in End-of-Life Care.
J Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;19(4):408-20. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0341. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
Video decision aids to assist with advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 24;5(6):e007491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007491.
7
Ethics and medico legal aspects of "not for resuscitation".
Indian J Palliat Care. 2010 May;16(2):66-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.68404.
8
Educating the community about violence through a gun turn-in program.
J Community Health. 2001 Oct;26(5):331-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1010411100603.

本文引用的文献

1
See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders.
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jun 24;156(12):1285-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.12.1285.
4
Attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nursing homes.
Am J Med. 1993 Aug;95(2):121-2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90251-j.
5
Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun;8(6):295-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02600139.
6
7
Survival in the elderly after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Nov;21(11):1645-51. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199311000-00012.
8
Patient acceptance of an information sheet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation options.
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Dec;8(12):679-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02598286.
9
Long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
N Engl J Med. 1982 Jun 3;306(22):1340-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198206033062206.
10
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of old people.
Lancet. 1983 Jul 30;2(8344):267-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90244-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验