Ansell S M, Kurtin P J, Stenson M, Habermann T M, Greipp P R, Therneau T M, Witzig T E
Division of Hematology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Leuk Lymphoma. 1999 Aug;34(5-6):529-37. doi: 10.3109/10428199909058480.
The reasons for differences in outcome between groups of patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) defined by clinical prognostic factors are largely unknown. Measures of cell proliferation may offer a biological explanation for these differences. This study tested the hypothesis that these survival differences between the groups defined by established prognostic factors were due to the proliferative index. The bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (LI), a measure of the S-phase fraction, was prospectively determined on fresh tumor specimens obtained at initial diagnosis in 80 patients with DLCL seen between 1986-1993 at a single institution. Patients were grouped using prognostic factors that were significant in a univariate analysis as well as the International Index (IPI). The LI in each of these groups was compared to determine whether the differences in outcome between the groups could be explained by differences in the LI. The median LI for all patients was 5.1% (range: 0.1-25%). When the predictive effect of the LI on response and survival was analyzed, the LI did not correlate with complete response or disease-free survival (DFS). There was a trend, however, for patients with a lower LI to have a poorer overall survival (p=0.06). When the patients were analyzed using the International Index (IPI), the mean LI for patients in the low-risk, low-intermediate, high-intermediate and high risk groups was 7.1%, 10.0%, 6.4% and 6.6% respectively (p=0.41). When analyzed separately, there was no significant difference in the LI for any of the patient groups defined by significant prognostic factors. The only difference in the LI was that the median LI in patients with T-cell DLCL was significantly lower than the LI in patients with B-cell DLCL (p=0.001) and these patients had an inferior complete response rate (p=0.001), disease-free survival (p=0.003) and overall survival (p=0.015). In this study, the LI, a measure of lymphoma cell proliferation, was not a significant prognostic factor for response, disease-free survival or overall survival. Furthermore, the LI did not explain the differences in outcome between patient groups defined by the IPI. However, a lower LI seen in patients with T-cell DLCL may account for their poorer response to therapy and inferior survival when compared to patients with B-cell DLCL.
由临床预后因素所定义的弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤(DLCL)患者组间结局存在差异,其原因在很大程度上尚不清楚。细胞增殖指标可能为这些差异提供生物学解释。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即由既定预后因素所定义的各组间生存差异是由于增殖指数所致。在1986年至1993年期间于某单一机构就诊的80例DLCL患者初诊时获取的新鲜肿瘤标本上,前瞻性地测定了作为S期细胞比例指标的溴脱氧尿苷标记指数(LI)。使用单因素分析中有显著意义的预后因素以及国际预后指数(IPI)对患者进行分组。比较这些组中每组的LI,以确定组间结局差异是否可由LI差异来解释。所有患者的LI中位数为5.1%(范围:0.1 - 25%)。当分析LI对缓解和生存的预测作用时,LI与完全缓解或无病生存期(DFS)无相关性。然而,LI较低的患者总体生存有较差趋势(p = 0.06)。当使用国际预后指数(IPI)分析患者时,低危、低中危、高中危和高危组患者的平均LI分别为7.1%、10.0%、6.4%和6.6%(p = 0.41)。单独分析时,由显著预后因素所定义的任何患者组的LI均无显著差异。LI的唯一差异在于T细胞DLCL患者的LI中位数显著低于B细胞DLCL患者(p = 0.001),且这些患者的完全缓解率较低(p = 0.001)、无病生存期(p = 0.003)和总体生存期(p = 0.015)较差。在本研究中,作为淋巴瘤细胞增殖指标的LI并非缓解、无病生存期或总体生存期的显著预后因素。此外,LI并不能解释由IPI所定义的患者组间结局差异。然而,与B细胞DLCL患者相比,T细胞DLCL患者中较低的LI可能是其治疗反应较差和生存期较短的原因。