Suppr超能文献

由非医生内镜医师使用乙状结肠镜进行结直肠癌筛查。

Screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy by nonphysician endoscopists.

作者信息

Wallace M B, Kemp J A, Meyer F, Horton K, Reffel A, Christiansen C L, Farraye F A

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1999 Sep;107(3):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00225-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Screening with sigmoidoscopy reduces the risk of death from colorectal cancer. Only 30% of eligible patients have undergone sigmoidoscopy, in part because of a limited supply of endoscopists. We evaluated the performance and safety of screening sigmoidoscopic examinations by trained nonphysician endoscopists in comparison with board-certified gastroenterologists.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Asymptomatic patients 50 years or older without evidence of fecal occult blood and no personal history or family history of a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer under age 55 years were offered sigmoidoscopy. All examinations were performed either by a gastroenterologist or a trained nonphysician endoscopist at a staff model health maintenance organization. Outcomes included the depth of examination, number and histology of polyps, and complications.

RESULTS

Nonphysicians performed 2,323 sigmoidoscopic examinations, and physicians performed 1,378 examinations. The mean (+/-SD) depth of sigmoidoscopy examinations performed by nonphysicians was 52 +/- 10 cm compared with 55 +/- 9 cm (P <0.001) in physicians. Nonphysicians detected neoplastic polyps in a greater proportion of patients (7.8%) than physicians (5.8%), but this difference was not significant after adjusting for differences in the age, sex, and family history of the patients (P = 0.35). No major complications occurred. The cost per examination, including the nonphysician training cost, was lower for nonphysicians ($186 per examination) than for physicians ($283 per examination).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately trained nonphysicians may be capable of performing safe and effective screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy. An increased use of nonphysicians to perform sigmoidoscopy may increase the availability and reduce the cost of the procedure.

摘要

目的

乙状结肠镜筛查可降低结直肠癌的死亡风险。仅有30%符合条件的患者接受了乙状结肠镜检查,部分原因是内镜医师数量有限。我们评估了经过培训的非医师内镜检查人员与获得委员会认证的胃肠病学家进行乙状结肠镜筛查检查的性能和安全性。

对象与方法

向50岁及以上、无粪便潜血证据、无个人或55岁以下一级亲属结直肠癌家族史的无症状患者提供乙状结肠镜检查。所有检查均由胃肠病学家或经过培训的非医师内镜检查人员在一家员工型健康维护组织进行。结果包括检查深度、息肉数量及组织学类型以及并发症情况。

结果

非医师进行了2323例乙状结肠镜检查,医师进行了1378例检查。非医师进行的乙状结肠镜检查平均(±标准差)深度为52±10 cm,而医师为55±9 cm(P<0.001)。非医师在更大比例的患者(7.8%)中检测到肿瘤性息肉,高于医师(5.8%),但在对患者年龄、性别和家族史差异进行校正后,这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.35)。未发生重大并发症。包括非医师培训成本在内,每次检查的成本非医师(每次检查186美元)低于医师(每次检查283美元)。

结论

经过适当培训的非医师可能有能力通过柔性乙状结肠镜进行安全有效的结直肠癌筛查。增加非医师进行乙状结肠镜检查的比例可能会提高可及性并降低该检查的成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验