Suppr超能文献

基于人群的创伤系统有效性评估研究。

Population-based research assessing the effectiveness of trauma systems.

作者信息

Mullins R J, Mann N C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland 97201-3098, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3 Suppl):S59-66. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909001-00013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review published evidence regarding the effectiveness of trauma systems by using population-based data.

DESIGN

A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature assessing the influence of trauma system implementation on the outcome of all injured patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature available in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and CINHAL was reviewed for studies that use population-based data to assess the benefit of trauma system development. Studies were included that assessed trauma systems in North America and used a comparison or control group in the analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Published evidence, reported for eight of the nine trauma systems evaluated, demonstrates improved outcomes, principally measured as hospital survival. Improvement occurred after the trauma system or some component of a trauma system (e.g., sophisticated prehospital care) was established.

CONCLUSION

Population-based evidence supports a 15 to 20% improved survival rate among seriously injured patients with trauma system implementation. Future study is required to determine whether trauma systems improve the outcome of all injured patients, not just high-risk subsets of the population.

摘要

目的

通过使用基于人群的数据来回顾已发表的关于创伤系统有效性的证据。

设计

对同行评审文献进行系统评价,评估创伤系统实施对所有受伤患者结局的影响。

材料与方法

检索MEDLINE、HealthSTAR和CINHAL中可用的文献,查找使用基于人群的数据来评估创伤系统发展益处的研究。纳入评估北美创伤系统且在分析中使用了比较组或对照组的研究。

主要结果

在所评估的九个创伤系统中的八个系统的已发表证据表明,结局有所改善,主要以医院生存率来衡量。在创伤系统或创伤系统的某些组成部分(如先进的院前护理)建立后出现了改善。

结论

基于人群的证据支持,实施创伤系统可使重伤患者的生存率提高15%至20%。需要进一步研究以确定创伤系统是否能改善所有受伤患者的结局,而不仅仅是人群中的高危亚组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验