Paul T R, Marias M, Pons P T, Pons K A, Moore E E
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Colorado 80204, USA.
J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3):455-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909000-00004.
Management of the injured child in the prehospital setting continues to be debated. Issues raised in the literature include time spent on scene, skill maintenance and performance, and reported poorer outcomes compared with adults.
Retrospective 2-year review of all pediatric (n = 232) and adult (n = 3,375) patients treated by a single emergency medical services agency and transported and admitted to a Level I trauma center. Patients were divided into two groups, pediatric (age 0 to 12 years) and adult (age >12 years) and further stratified into three Injury Severity Score subgroups; 1 to 15, 16 to 25, and more than 25.
There were no significant differences in scene time for any of the groups. The percentage of patients with intravenous access or endotracheal intubation in the field and the mean Injury Severity Score were not different for the moderate or severely injured groups, although in the minor trauma group fewer pediatric patients had intravenous access or intubation performed. There were no differences in outcome for any of the groups.
Paramedics are able to provide pediatric trauma patients a level of care comparable to that provided adult patients with similar outcome.
院前环境中受伤儿童的管理仍存在争议。文献中提出的问题包括现场停留时间、技能维持与表现,以及与成人相比报道的较差预后。
对由单一紧急医疗服务机构治疗并转运至一级创伤中心并入院的所有儿科患者(n = 232)和成人患者(n = 3375)进行为期2年的回顾性研究。患者分为两组,儿科(0至12岁)和成人(>12岁),并进一步分为三个损伤严重度评分亚组;1至15分、16至25分和超过25分。
任何组别的现场停留时间均无显著差异。中度或重度受伤组患者在现场建立静脉通路或气管插管的百分比以及平均损伤严重度评分并无差异,尽管在轻伤组中接受静脉通路建立或插管的儿科患者较少。任何组别的预后均无差异。
护理人员能够为儿科创伤患者提供与成人患者相当的护理水平,且预后相似。