Genta R M
Department of Pathology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Aug;11 Suppl 2:S29-33; discussion S43-5. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199908002-00006.
Much of what is currently accepted regarding Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis and its relationship with gastric adenocarcinoma rests on the assumption that atrophic gastritis can be correctly identified and reproducibly recognized. Several studies have indicated that pathologists have a low level of agreement on this topic, and the terms 'gastric atrophy' and 'atrophic gastritis' remain imprecisely defined and poorly understood. Furthermore, the genesis and progression of the atrophic changes that take place in the gastric mucosa of some individuals infected with H. pylori are incompletely characterized. The lack of a strict definition of atrophic gastritis is at least partially responsible for recent concerns regarding the effects of prolonged pharmacological gastric acid inhibition in patients with H. pylori infection. One recent paper concluded that patients with reflux oesophagitis and H. pylori infection who are treated with longterm acid inhibition have an increased risk of atrophic gastritis. As this term evokes associations with an increased risk of gastric cancer, the possibility was subsequently raised that anti-secretory maintenance therapy might increase the risk of cancer in H. pylori-positive patients. A second report, however, concluded that long-term acid-inhibitory therapy for an average of three years is no different from fundoplication in the development of gastric atrophy. Also, because no intestinal metaplasia developed in any of the patients, and only atrophic gastritis associated with intestinal metaplasia is considered a precursor of gastric cancer, there is no evidence to support the hypothesis that long-term acid inhibition in individuals with H. pylori infection increases the risk of gastric cancer.
目前关于幽门螺杆菌相关性胃炎及其与胃腺癌关系的许多公认观点,都基于萎缩性胃炎能够被正确识别且具有可重复性这一假设。多项研究表明,病理学家在这个问题上的一致性较低,“胃萎缩”和“萎缩性胃炎”这两个术语仍然定义不精确且理解不充分。此外,一些感染幽门螺杆菌的个体胃黏膜中发生的萎缩性变化的发生机制和进展情况尚未完全明确。萎缩性胃炎缺乏严格定义至少部分导致了近期对幽门螺杆菌感染患者长期药物性胃酸抑制作用的担忧。最近一篇论文得出结论,反流性食管炎且感染幽门螺杆菌的患者接受长期胃酸抑制治疗后,患萎缩性胃炎的风险增加。由于这个术语会让人联想到患胃癌风险增加,随后有人提出抗分泌维持治疗可能会增加幽门螺杆菌阳性患者患癌风险。然而,另一篇报告得出结论,平均三年的长期胃酸抑制治疗在胃萎缩的发生方面与胃底折叠术没有差异。而且,由于所有患者均未发生肠化生,且只有与肠化生相关的萎缩性胃炎才被认为是胃癌的前驱病变,所以没有证据支持幽门螺杆菌感染个体长期胃酸抑制会增加患胃癌风险这一假设。