The age of the urologist affects the postoperative care of prostate carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND

Strategies utilized by urologists in managing prostate carcinoma patients after radical prostatectomy vary appreciably. The reason for this is unclear. The authors investigated the effect of practitioner age on management strategies.

METHODS

From among the total of 12,500 American Urological Association (AUA) members, 4467 were randomly selected to receive a custom-designed survey about their care of prostate carcinoma patients after radical prostatectomy. Respondents were asked to describe their follow-up practices for patients treated with curative intent, their motivations regarding postoperative surveillance, their methods of evaluating a postoperative increase in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and their choices of treatment for patients with recurrent prostate carcinoma.

RESULTS

One thousand fifty responses were analyzed. There was a statistically significant influence of practitioner age on the management of at-risk patients, but it was quite small. The typical workup for an elevated postoperative serum PSA level also varied significantly according to practitioner age; older urologists ordered more serum prostatic acid phosphatase levels and computed tomography scans of the abdomen and pelvis, whereas younger urologists ordered more bone scans. The treatment of recurrent prostate carcinoma did not vary significantly according to urologist age. The opinions of older urologists regarding the survival benefits of postoperative surveillance were considerably different from the opinions of their younger colleagues.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that urologist age accounts for some of the variation in the postoperative management of prostate carcinoma patients. Differences in beliefs regarding the benefits of surveillance may be partially responsible for this. Persuasive clinical research will probably be required to increase the uniformity of practice in this important area.