Suppr超能文献

非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂:启动抗高血压治疗的一个有价值的选择?

Felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet: a valuable option to initiate antihypertensive therapy?

作者信息

Waeber B, Detry J M, Dahlöf B, Puig J G, Gundersen T, Hosie J, Januszewicz W, Lindström C J, Magometschnigg D, Safar M, Tanser P, Toutouzas P

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pathophysiology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1999 Sep;12(9 Pt 1):915-20. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00067-9.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a calcium antagonist/beta-blocker fixed combination tablet used as first-line antihypertesnive therapy in comparison with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and placebo. Patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 110 mm Hg at the end of a 4-week run-in period) were randomly allocated to a double-blind, 12-week treatment with either a combination tablet of felodipine and metoprolol (Logimax), 5/50 mg daily (n = 321), enalapril, 10 mg daily (n = 321), or placebo (n = 304), with the possibility of doubling the dose after 4 or 8 weeks of treatment if needed (diastolic blood pressure remaining >90 mm Hg). The combined felodipine-metoprolol treatment controlled blood pressure (diastolic < or =90 mm Hg 24 h after dose) in 72% of patients after 12 weeks, as compared with 49% for enalapril and 30% for placebo. A dose adjustment was required in 38% of patients receiving the combination, in 63% of patients allocated to placebo, and 61% of enalapril-treated patients. The overall incidence of adverse events was 54.5% during felodipine-metoprolol treatment; the corresponding values for enalapril and placebo were 51.7% and 47.4%, respectively. Withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events occurred in 18 patients treated with the combination, in 10 patients on enalapril, and 12 patients on placebo. No significant change in patients' well-being was observed in either of the three study groups. These results show that a fixed combination tablet of felodipine and metoprolol allows to normalize blood pressure in a substantially larger fraction of patients than enalapril given alone. This improved efficacy is obtained without impairing the tolerability. The fixed-dose combination of felodipine and metoprolol, therefore, may become a valuable option to initiate antihypertensive treatment.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一种钙拮抗剂/β受体阻滞剂固定复方片剂作为一线抗高血压治疗药物与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂及安慰剂相比的疗效和耐受性。将无并发症的原发性高血压患者(在4周导入期结束时舒张压在95至110 mmHg之间)随机分配至双盲、为期12周的治疗,分别给予非洛地平与美托洛尔复方片剂(Logimax),每日5/50 mg(n = 321)、依那普利,每日10 mg(n = 321)或安慰剂(n = 304),治疗4或8周后(舒张压仍>90 mmHg)如有需要可加倍剂量。12周后,非洛地平-美托洛尔联合治疗使72%的患者血压得到控制(给药后24小时舒张压≤90 mmHg),依那普利组为49%,安慰剂组为30%。接受联合治疗的患者中有38%需要调整剂量,分配至安慰剂组的患者中有63%,依那普利治疗的患者中有61%。非洛地平-美托洛尔治疗期间不良事件的总发生率为54.5%;依那普利和安慰剂的相应值分别为51.7%和47.4%。联合治疗组有18例患者因不良事件停药,依那普利组有10例,安慰剂组有12例。三个研究组患者的健康状况均未观察到显著变化。这些结果表明,与单独使用依那普利相比,非洛地平与美托洛尔固定复方片剂能使更大比例的患者血压恢复正常。在不损害耐受性的情况下获得了这种提高的疗效。因此,非洛地平与美托洛尔的固定剂量组合可能成为启动抗高血压治疗的一个有价值的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验