Suppr超能文献

胸段食管鳞状细胞癌扩大食管切除术后的预后因素

Prognostic factors after extended esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

作者信息

Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Dhar D K, Kotoh T, Shibakita M, Ohno S, Masunaga R, Kubota H, Kohno H, Nagasue N

机构信息

Second Department of Surgery, Shimane Medical University, Shimane, Japan.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 1999 Oct;72(2):88-93. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199910)72:2<88::aid-jso9>3.0.co;2-v.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES

In Japan, extended esophagectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy has become the standard surgical procedure for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Although mortality and morbidity rates after such extensive esophagectomy have been acceptable, the long-term outcomes are not necessarily satisfactory.

METHODS

Among 235 patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus between June 1981 and March 1998, 143 patients (60.9%) underwent extended esophagectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy. To exclude the effects of surgery-related postoperative complications, 14 patients who died within 90 days after operation were excluded. Thus, clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of 129 patients were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were alive and free of cancer. Sixty-six patients died: 37 of recurrence of the esophageal cancer and 29 of other causes. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates in the 129 patients were 78.8%, 53.5%, 45.8%, and 30.9%, respectively, and the disease-specific survival rates were 85.7%, 69.1%, 67.9%, and 56.2%, respectively. The factors influencing the disease-specific survival rate were tumor location (upper third vs. non-upper third), Borrmann classification (0, 1 vs. 2, 3), size of tumor (</=3.0 vs. >3.0 cm), depth of invasion (T1, 2 vs. T3, 4), number of lymph node metastases (0 or 1 vs. >/=2), time of operation (</=420 vs. >420 min), amount of blood transfused (</=2 vs. >/=3 U), lymph vessel invasion (marked vs. not marked), and blood vessel invasion (marked vs. not marked). Among those significant variables, independent prognostic factors for survival determined by multivariate analysis were number of lymph node metastases (P < 0.001), amount of blood transfusions (P = 0.0016), and tumor location (P = 0.0382).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a single metastatic node after extended esophagectomy should be considered to have excellent prognosis, like patients with pN0 tumors. Patients with multiple involved nodes should receive aggressive postoperative adjuvant treatments. Reduced blood loss during extended esophagectomy and minimal blood transfusions might improve the outcome of curative esophageal resections.

摘要

背景与目的

在日本,扩大食管切除术联合广泛淋巴结清扫术已成为胸段食管癌的标准手术方式。尽管如此广泛的食管切除术后的死亡率和发病率尚可接受,但长期预后并不一定令人满意。

方法

在1981年6月至1998年3月期间的235例胸段食管原发性鳞状细胞癌患者中,143例(60.9%)接受了扩大食管切除术联合广泛淋巴结清扫术。为排除手术相关术后并发症的影响,排除了术后90天内死亡的14例患者。因此,对129例患者的临床病理特征和预后因素进行了回顾性研究。

结果

63例患者存活且无癌。66例患者死亡:37例死于食管癌复发,29例死于其他原因。129例患者的1年、3年、5年和10年总生存率分别为78.8%、53.5%、45.8%和30.9%,疾病特异性生存率分别为85.7%、69.1%、67.9%和56.2%。影响疾病特异性生存率的因素有肿瘤位置(上三分之一段与非上三分之一段)、Borrmann分型(0、1型与2、3型)、肿瘤大小(≤3.0 cm与>3.0 cm)、浸润深度(T1、2期与T3、4期)、淋巴结转移数量(0或1个与≥2个)、手术时间(≤420分钟与>420分钟)、输血量(≤2单位与≥3单位)、淋巴管浸润(显著与不显著)和血管浸润(显著与不显著)。在这些显著变量中,多因素分析确定的独立生存预后因素为淋巴结转移数量(P<0.001)、输血量(P = 0.0016)和肿瘤位置(P = 0.0382)。

结论

扩大食管切除术后有单个转移淋巴结的患者应被认为预后良好,类似于pN0肿瘤患者。有多个受累淋巴结的患者应接受积极的术后辅助治疗。扩大食管切除术中减少失血和尽量少输血可能会改善根治性食管切除术的预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验