Lo S S, Kuo H S, Wu C W, Hsieh M C, Shyr Y M, Wang H C, Lui W Y
Department of Surgery, Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Jul-Aug;46(28):2690-3.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although the relationship between prognosis and age of patients with gastric cancer is controversial, a poorer prognosis in young patients has been suggested by most investigators. To further examine the hypothesis, a retrospective study was undertaken to analyze a large series of patients with gastric cancer in Taiwan.
A total of 1,642 consecutive patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and receiving further management at one medical center from 1988 to 1993 were reviewed. The gender, TNM tumor stage, rate of curative resection and survival of the patients were compared in the young age group (< or = 39 years) and the old age group (> 39 years). Survival was estimated with the product-limit method and difference in survival was tested by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was done by the Cox proportional hazard model.
Among the 1,642 patients, 61 patients were in the young age group and 1,581 patients were in the old age group. There was no significant difference for the 2 groups of patients in the distribution of TNM stage (stage I: 20%; II: 8%; III: 13%; IV: 59% vs. 19%, 11%, 25% and 45% respectively, in the old age group, p = 0.098) and rate of curative resection (38% vs 51% in the old age group, p = 0.059). The overall 5-year survival showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (25% vs. 29% in the old). Subgroup analyses showed that survival after curative resection and survival without curative treatment (including palliative resection and no resection) also had no difference in the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis also showed that age was not an independent factor.
Although most reports suggested a dismal prognosis in young patients with gastric cancer, based on our findings, young patients (< or = 39 years) do not have a worse prognosis than older patients.
背景/目的:尽管胃癌患者的预后与年龄之间的关系存在争议,但大多数研究者认为年轻患者的预后较差。为了进一步检验这一假设,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以分析台湾地区一大系列胃癌患者。
回顾了1988年至1993年期间在某医疗中心连续诊断为胃癌并接受进一步治疗的1642例患者。比较了年轻年龄组(≤39岁)和老年年龄组(>39岁)患者的性别、TNM肿瘤分期、根治性切除率和生存率。采用乘积极限法估计生存率,用对数秩检验检验生存率的差异。通过Cox比例风险模型进行多因素分析。
在1642例患者中,年轻年龄组有61例,老年年龄组有1581例。两组患者在TNM分期分布(I期:20%;II期:8%;III期:13%;IV期:59%,老年年龄组分别为19%、11%、25%和45%,p = 0.098)和根治性切除率(38%,老年年龄组为51%,p = 0.059)方面无显著差异。总体5年生存率在两组之间无显著差异(25%,老年组为29%)。亚组分析显示,根治性切除后的生存率和未进行根治性治疗(包括姑息性切除和未切除)的生存率在两组中也无差异。多因素分析还显示年龄不是一个独立因素。
尽管大多数报告表明年轻胃癌患者预后不佳,但根据我们的研究结果,年轻患者(≤39岁)的预后并不比老年患者差。