Suppr超能文献

真核生物的多样性

The Diversity of Eukaryotes.

作者信息

Patterson David J

出版信息

Am Nat. 1999 Oct;154(S4):S96-S124. doi: 10.1086/303287.

Abstract

The discipline of evolutionary protistology has emerged in the past 30 yr. There is as yet no agreed view of how protists are interrelated or how they should be classified. The foundations of a stable taxonomic superstructure for the protists and other eukaryotes lie in cataloging the diversity of the major monophyletic lineages of these organisms. The use of common patterns of cell organization (ultrastructural identity) seems to provide us with the most robust hypotheses of such lineages. These lineages are placed in 71 groups without identifiable sister taxa. These groups are here referred to as "major building blocks." For the first time, the compositions, ultrastructural identities, synapomorphies (where available), and subgroups of the major building blocks are summarized. More than 200 further lineages without clear identities are listed. This catalog includes all known major elements of the comprehensive evolutionary tree of protists and eukaryotes. Different approaches among protistologists to issues of nomenclature, ranking, and definitions of these groups are discussed, with particular reference to two groups-the stramenopiles and the Archezoa. The concept of "extended in-group" is introduced to refer to in-groups and the most proximate sister group and to assist in identifying the hierarchical location of taxa.

摘要

进化原生生物学这一学科在过去30年中兴起。对于原生生物之间的相互关系以及它们应如何分类,目前尚无一致的观点。为原生生物和其他真核生物建立一个稳定的分类学上层结构的基础在于梳理这些生物主要单系谱系的多样性。利用细胞组织的共同模式(超微结构特征)似乎能为我们提供关于此类谱系最可靠的假说。这些谱系被归为71个没有可识别姐妹类群的组。这里将这些组称为“主要构建模块”。首次总结了主要构建模块的组成、超微结构特征、共衍征(如可获取)以及亚组。列出了200多个身份尚不明确的其他谱系。该分类目录涵盖了原生生物和真核生物综合进化树的所有已知主要元素。文中讨论了原生生物学家在这些类群的命名法、分类等级和定义问题上的不同方法,特别提及了两个类群——不等鞭毛类和古原生生物。引入了“扩展内群”的概念,用以指代内群及其最接近的姐妹类群,并有助于确定分类单元的层级位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验