• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The long-term effects of placebo in patients with chronic schizophrenia.安慰剂对慢性精神分裂症患者的长期影响。
Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Oct 15;46(8):1092-105. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00227-9.
2
Adverse events during a placebo phase for inpatients with chronic schizophrenia.慢性精神分裂症住院患者安慰剂阶段的不良事件。
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Oct 1;50(7):487-92. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01225-2.
3
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of extract of Ginkgo biloba added to haloperidol in treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia.一项针对难治性精神分裂症患者的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,该试验将银杏叶提取物添加至氟哌啶醇治疗中。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;62(11):878-83. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n1107.
4
Quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia. A high- and low-dose double-blind comparison with placebo. Seroquel Study Group.喹硫平治疗精神分裂症患者。与安慰剂的高剂量和低剂量双盲对照研究。思瑞康研究组。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;54(6):549-57. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830180067009.
5
Effect size of symptom status in withdrawal of typical antipsychotics and subsequent clozapine treatment in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.难治性精神分裂症患者停用典型抗精神病药物及后续使用氯氮平治疗时症状状态的效应量
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;160(6):1133-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1133.
6
Aripiprazole augmentation in clozapine-treated patients with refractory schizophrenia: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.阿立哌唑辅助治疗氯氮平治疗的难治性精神分裂症患者:一项为期8周的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 May;69(5):720-31. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0505.
7
Effects of smoking during antipsychotic withdrawal in patients with chronic schizophrenia.慢性精神分裂症患者在停用抗精神病药物期间吸烟的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2000 Dec 15;46(2-3):119-27. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00230-3.
8
Multiple fixed doses of "Seroquel" (quetiapine) in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: a comparison with haloperidol and placebo. The Seroquel Trial 13 Study Group.“思瑞康”(喹硫平)多固定剂量用于精神分裂症急性加重患者:与氟哌啶醇和安慰剂的比较。思瑞康试验13研究组
Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Aug 15;42(4):233-46. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00190-x.
9
Olanzapine versus placebo in adolescents with schizophrenia: a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.奥氮平与安慰剂治疗青少年精神分裂症的比较:一项为期6周的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;48(1):60-70. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181900404.
10
Amisulpride for very late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis: the ATLAS three-arm RCT.氨磺必利治疗极晚发性类似精神分裂症的精神病:ATLAS 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(67):1-62. doi: 10.3310/hta22670.

引用本文的文献

1
Antipsychotic medication-mediated cognitive change in schizophrenia and polygenic score for cognitive ability.抗精神病药物介导的精神分裂症认知变化与认知能力的多基因评分
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Nov 9;27:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100223. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
The nature of relapse in schizophrenia.精神分裂症复发的本质。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 8;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-50.
3
Research risk for persons with psychiatric disorders: a decisional framework to meet the ethical challenge.精神疾病患者的研究风险:应对伦理挑战的决策框架
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Mar;60(3):374-83. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.374.
4
Feasibility of reducing the duration of placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia research.缩短精神分裂症研究中安慰剂对照试验时长的可行性
Schizophr Bull. 2008 Mar;34(2):292-301. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm152. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
5
Ethical concerns in schizophrenia research: looking back and moving forward.精神分裂症研究中的伦理问题:回顾与展望。
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):30-6. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj023. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
6
A summary of important documents in the field of research ethics.研究伦理领域重要文献综述。
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):69-80. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj005. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
7
First-episode schizophrenia: a focus on pharmacological treatment and safety considerations.首发精神分裂症:聚焦于药物治疗及安全性考量
Drugs. 2005;65(8):1113-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565080-00006.
8
Rationale for the study of early intervention.早期干预研究的理论依据。
Schizophr Res. 2001 Aug 1;51(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00242-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.在针对无决策能力受试者的研究中实现适当平衡:美国国家心理健康协会对工作组提案的看法。
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(1):174-92.
2
Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation: state-of-the-art and beyond.评估参与研究的同意能力:现状与展望。
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(1):66-87.
3
Drug-free research in schizophrenia: an overview of the controversy.精神分裂症的无药物研究:争议概述
IRB. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-5.
4
Clozapine: a comparison with other novel antipsychotics.氯氮平:与其他新型抗精神病药物的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 Suppl 12:30-4.
5
Do antipsychotic medications decrease the risk of suicide in patients with schizophrenia?抗精神病药物会降低精神分裂症患者的自杀风险吗?
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 Suppl 2:100-3; discussion 111-6.
6
The effects of early and sustained intervention on the long-term morbidity of schizophrenia.早期及持续干预对精神分裂症长期发病率的影响
J Psychiatr Res. 1998 May-Aug;32(3-4):169-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(97)00014-9.
7
The Canadian experience with risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia: an overview.加拿大使用利培酮治疗精神分裂症的经验概述。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1998 Sep;23(4):229-39.
8
Analysis of the initial treatment phase in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病初始治疗阶段分析
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1998;172(33):71-6.
9
First-episode schizophrenia with long duration of untreated psychosis. Pathways to care.首发精神分裂症伴精神病性症状长期未治。就医途径。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1998;172(33):45-52.
10
Schizophrenia as a chronic active brain process: a study of progressive brain structural change subsequent to the onset of schizophrenia.
Psychiatry Res. 1997 Jul 4;74(3):129-40. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4927(97)00012-7.

安慰剂对慢性精神分裂症患者的长期影响。

The long-term effects of placebo in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

作者信息

Wyatt R J, Henter I D, Bartko J J

机构信息

National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Oct 15;46(8):1092-105. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00227-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00227-9
PMID:10536745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4303345/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been hypothesized that placebo periods may increase long-term morbidity for patients with schizophrenia. In this study, the long-term effect of a placebo period was evaluated in a group of relatively treatment-refractory patients with chronic schizophrenia.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined behavioral rating scores for 127 patients with chronic schizophrenia who were placed in a double-blind placebo study on the inpatient units of the National Institute of Mental Health Neuropsychiatric Research Hospital. Patients were rated daily with the Psychiatric Symptom Assessment Scale (PSAS), an extended and anchored version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). At the end of the placebo phase, most patients were placed on haloperidol. Pre-placebo baseline PSAS ratings were compared with, first, discharge ratings and second, post-placebo ratings. To determine expected variability in the course of illness, patients in the placebo group were compared with patients hospitalized during the same time period, but who did not enter the placebo study.

RESULTS

By discharge, ratings for placebo patients had returned to baseline. Post-placebo ratings were quite variable. Although many of the placebo patients had returned to baseline by day 3 of the post-placebo phase, others had not returned to baseline by post-placebo day 42. PSAS Total Scores for patients who left the study early were no different at baseline, placebo, or through post-placebo day 35 compared with patients who completed the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that given a sufficiently lengthy recovery period, patients with chronic schizophrenia who go through a placebo phase return to baseline, but that the speed with which they attain that recovery is highly variable.

摘要

背景

有假设认为,安慰剂期可能会增加精神分裂症患者的长期发病率。在本研究中,对一组相对难治的慢性精神分裂症患者进行了安慰剂期的长期效果评估。

方法

这项回顾性研究检查了127名慢性精神分裂症患者的行为评分,这些患者在国立精神卫生神经精神病学研究所医院的住院部接受了双盲安慰剂研究。患者每天使用精神症状评估量表(PSAS)进行评分,该量表是简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)的扩展版且有锚定标准。在安慰剂阶段结束时,大多数患者开始服用氟哌啶醇。将安慰剂前的基线PSAS评分首先与出院时的评分进行比较,其次与安慰剂后的评分进行比较。为了确定疾病过程中的预期变异性,将安慰剂组的患者与同一时期住院但未进入安慰剂研究的患者进行比较。

结果

到出院时,安慰剂组患者的评分已恢复到基线水平。安慰剂后的评分差异很大。尽管许多安慰剂组患者在安慰剂后阶段的第3天已恢复到基线水平,但其他患者在安慰剂后第42天仍未恢复到基线水平。与完成研究的患者相比,提前退出研究的患者在基线、安慰剂阶段或安慰剂后第35天的PSAS总分没有差异。

结论

结果表明,给予足够长的恢复期后,经历安慰剂阶段的慢性精神分裂症患者会恢复到基线水平,但他们恢复到该水平的速度差异很大。