Lafferty C K, Heaney C A, Chen M S
Department of Adult, Counseling, Health and Vocational Education, College of Education, Kent State University, OH 44240, USA.
Health Educ Res. 1999 Feb;14(1):139-46. doi: 10.1093/her/14.1.139.
This study examines the relationship of positive and negative perceptions of smoking to self-reported readiness to quit smoking among Southeast (SE) Asian males of Cambodian, Laotian or Vietnamese descent. In order to investigate this relationship, measures of decisional balance constructs (i.e. the pros and cons of smoking) appropriate for these ethnic groups were developed. Decisional balance was calculated by subtracting the cons from the pros. Following the criteria established by Prochaska and DiClemente, subjects were categorized into four levels of readiness to quit smoking (precontemplation, contemplation, preparation/action and maintenance). The expected pattern of relationship between decisional balance and stages of change included: (1) the cons of smoking being of less importance than the pros of smoking for those smokers in the precontemplation stage, (2) the pros and cons intersecting at the contemplation stage, and (3) the cons being of greater importance than the pros in the later stages of change. The SE Asian men in this study did not exhibit these decisional balance patterns, although mean decisional balance scores for precontemplators and contemplators were significantly more positive than mean scores for those in the preparation/action and maintenance stages. Decisional balance patterns differed across the three ethnic groups included in the sample.
本研究考察了柬埔寨、老挝或越南裔东南亚男性对吸烟的积极和消极认知与自我报告的戒烟意愿之间的关系。为了探究这种关系,开发了适用于这些种族群体的决策平衡结构(即吸烟的利弊)测量方法。决策平衡通过用吸烟的益处减去弊端来计算。按照普罗查斯卡和迪克莱门特确立的标准,将受试者分为四个戒烟意愿水平(未考虑阶段、考虑阶段、准备/行动阶段和维持阶段)。决策平衡与改变阶段之间预期的关系模式包括:(1)对于处于未考虑阶段的吸烟者,吸烟的弊端不如益处重要;(2)在考虑阶段,益处和弊端相交;(3)在改变的后期阶段,弊端比益处更重要。本研究中的东南亚男性并未表现出这些决策平衡模式,尽管未考虑者和考虑者的平均决策平衡得分明显比处于准备/行动阶段和维持阶段的人的平均得分更积极。样本中包括的三个种族群体的决策平衡模式有所不同。