Alexander R, Booth J, Olufolabi A J, El-Moalem H E, Glass P S
Department of Anesthesiology, Box 3094, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Anaesthesia. 1999 Nov;54(11):1032-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01070.x.
Sixty ASA physical status I and II, premedicated patients were administered propofol 2 mg x kg-1 and remifentanil 2 microg x kg-1 (group R), alfentanil 50 microg x kg-1 (group A) or suxamethonium 1 mg x kg-1 (group S) as a rapid bolus. One minute after study drug administration, tracheal intubation was performed. Intubation conditions were then scored. Excellent or good conditions were observed in only 35% in group R compared with groups S and A (100% and 85%, respectively; p < 0.001). The haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation was blunted in groups R and A compared with group S (p < 0.001). The mean heart rate in groups R and A was significantly lower than group S (p < 0.001). We conclude that remifentanil 2 microg x kg-1 given as a rapid bolus will not produce intubating conditions as good as those obtained with alfentanil 50 microg x kg-1 or suxamethonium 1 mg x kg-1 if administered after propofol 2 mg x kg-1.
六十例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级且已进行术前用药的患者,快速推注给予丙泊酚2mg/kg和瑞芬太尼2μg/kg(R组)、阿芬太尼50μg/kg(A组)或琥珀胆碱1mg/kg(S组)。给药研究药物1分钟后进行气管插管。然后对插管条件进行评分。与S组和A组相比,R组仅有35%观察到优良条件(S组和A组分别为100%和85%;p<0.001)。与S组相比,R组和A组对气管插管的血流动力学反应减弱(p<0.001)。R组和A组的平均心率显著低于S组(p<0.001)。我们得出结论,如果在给予丙泊酚2mg/kg后快速推注给予瑞芬太尼2μg/kg,其产生的插管条件不如给予阿芬太尼50μg/kg或琥珀胆碱1mg/kg所获得的条件好。