Buchsbaum D J, Khazaeli M B, Mayo M S, Roberson P L
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Oct;5(10 Suppl):3153s-3159s.
One of the problems in achieving cures with radioimmunotherapy is that hematological toxicity limits the quantity of radiolabeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) that can be administered. The MAb CC49 binds with high affinity to the TAG-72 antigen expressed in many human adenocarcinomas. We investigated tumor growth inhibition, survival, and tumor and bone marrow dosimetry after multiple bolus injections or continuous infusion of 131I-labeled CC49 MAb in a human colon cancer xenograft model to determine which method of administration results in the highest therapeutic ratio. Groups of athymic nude mice bearing established s.c. LS174T human colon cancer xenografts received three i.p. bolus injections (3X) of 131I-labeled CC49 (3X, days 0, 3, and 7) or were implanted i.p. with mini-osmotic pumps delivering 131I-labeled CC49 over 7 days. The total radionuclide doses administered were broken down into low-dose (< or = 450 microCi), medium-dose (450-800 microCi), and high-dose (> 800 microCi) groups. At the medium-dose level, the bolus-therapy animals did not have a significantly longer survival time but did have a significantly longer time-to-tumor doubling than the pump-therapy animals. The median survival for medium-dose bolus and pump therapy was 157 and 105 days, respectively, and the median time-to-tumor doubling was at least 114 and 77 days, respectively. At the low-dose level, the bolus-therapy animals had a significantly longer survival time but not a significantly longer time-to-tumor doubling than the pump-therapy animals. The median survival for low-dose bolus and pump therapy was 95.5 and 59 days, respectively, and the median time-to-tumor doubling was 73 and 38 days, respectively. The high-bolus dose was toxic. A comparison of the overall survival rate of pump therapy versus bolus therapy, excluding high-dose, resulted in the bolus-therapy animals having a longer survival time and a longer time-to-tumor doubling than the pump-therapy animals. Serial section autoradiography was used to reconstruct tumor activity density distributions over time. Average dose values calculated from total uptake data for 900 microCi administered activity yielded 158 Gy (3X) and 141 Gy (pump). Average three-dimensional doses using the radial histograms to calculate the absorbed fractions were 139 Gy and 123 Gy, respectively. This calculation includes energy loss external to the tumor. With cell proliferation parameters set to single fraction 60Co recurrence results, the effective dose (D(eff)) for local control was 11 Gy and 9 Gy, respectively. Three bolus injections resulted in a more uniform dose rate over a longer period, resulting in a calculated 19% improvement in D(eff) compared with pump administration. Dose to bone marrow was calculated assuming an activity concentration in bone marrow of 0.24 times the concentration in blood and an absorbed fraction of 0.63. For the 900-microCi 131I-labeled CC49 injected activity, pump administration resulted in an 80% higher calculated D(eff) to bone marrow compared with 3X bolus injection. These results demonstrate that 3X bolus injections were clearly superior to pump administration in terms of survival, tumor growth inhibition, tumor absorbed dose, and bone marrow dose.
放射免疫疗法实现治愈的问题之一是血液学毒性限制了可给予的放射性标记单克隆抗体(MAb)的量。MAb CC49与许多人类腺癌中表达的TAG-72抗原具有高亲和力结合。我们在人结肠癌异种移植模型中研究了多次推注注射或连续输注131I标记的CC49 MAb后的肿瘤生长抑制、生存期以及肿瘤和骨髓剂量测定,以确定哪种给药方法能产生最高的治疗比。携带已建立的皮下LS174T人结肠癌异种移植瘤的无胸腺裸鼠组接受三次腹腔推注注射(3X)131I标记的CC49(3X,第0、3和7天),或腹腔植入微型渗透泵,在7天内递送131I标记 的CC49。给予的总放射性核素剂量分为低剂量(≤450微居里)、中剂量(450 - 800微居里)和高剂量(>800微居里)组。在中剂量水平,推注治疗的动物生存期没有显著延长,但肿瘤倍增时间比泵治疗的动物显著延长。中剂量推注和泵治疗的中位生存期分别为157天和105天,中位肿瘤倍增时间分别至少为114天和77天。在低剂量水平,推注治疗的动物生存期显著延长,但肿瘤倍增时间没有比泵治疗的动物显著延长。低剂量推注和泵治疗的中位生存期分别为95.5天和59天,中位肿瘤倍增时间分别为73天和38天。高推注剂量有毒。比较泵治疗与推注治疗(不包括高剂量)的总体生存率,结果是推注治疗的动物比泵治疗的动物生存期更长,肿瘤倍增时间更长。连续切片放射自显影用于重建随时间的肿瘤活性密度分布。根据900微居里给药活度的总摄取数据计算的平均剂量值为158戈瑞(3X)和141戈瑞(泵)。使用径向直方图计算吸收分数的平均三维剂量分别为139戈瑞和123戈瑞。该计算包括肿瘤外部的能量损失。将细胞增殖参数设置为单次分割60Co复发结果时,局部控制的有效剂量(D(eff))分别为11戈瑞和9戈瑞。三次推注注射在更长时间内产生更均匀的剂量率,与泵给药相比,计算得出D(eff)提高了19%。假设骨髓中的活度浓度为血液中浓度的0.24倍,吸收分数为0.63,计算骨髓剂量。对于900微居里的131I标记的CC49注射活度,与3X推注注射相比,泵给药导致计算得出的骨髓D(eff)高80%。这些结果表明,在生存期、肿瘤生长抑制、肿瘤吸收剂量和骨髓剂量方面,3X推注注射明显优于泵给药。