Pert C, Jahoda A, Squire J
Department of Psychological Medicine, Academic Centre, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
Am J Ment Retard. 1999 Sep;104(5):399-409. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(1999)104<0399:AOIARC>2.0.CO;2.
An assessment task was devised to explore the attributional style and role-taking ability of 22 aggressive and 22 nonaggressive adults with moderate to mild mental retardation. Aggressive participants showed a hostile bias in their interpretation of others' intentions towards themselves within ambiguous interpersonal situations, although no difference was found across groups within clearly provocative situations. Furthermore, the role-taking ability of the aggressive participants was superior to the nonaggressive group, undermining the focus on global problems of interpersonal understanding as a causal factor of aggression for people with mental retardation.
设计了一项评估任务,以探究22名有中轻度智力障碍的攻击性成年人和22名非攻击性成年人的归因方式和角色采择能力。在模棱两可的人际情境中,攻击性参与者在解读他人对自己的意图时表现出敌意偏见,不过在明确具有挑衅性的情境中,两组之间未发现差异。此外,攻击性参与者的角色采择能力优于非攻击性组,这削弱了将人际理解方面的整体问题作为智力障碍者攻击行为的一个因果因素的观点。