Suppr超能文献

低亲和力、非竞争性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸拮抗剂对小鼠的行为影响及抗惊厥疗效

Behavioral effects and anticonvulsant efficacies of low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists in mice.

作者信息

Geter-Douglass B, Witkin J M

机构信息

Drug Development Group, NIDA Addiction Research Center, NIH, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(3):280-9. doi: 10.1007/s002130051118.

Abstract

RATIONALE

It has been hypothesized that low-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists may have therapeutic efficacy (e.g., in epilepsy, stroke, drug dependence) without the adverse side effects associated with high-affinity ligands (e.g., dizocilpine, phencyclidine).

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether low-affinity NMDA antagonists have a larger predicted therapeutic window than high-affinity ligands.

METHODS

In Swiss-Webster mice, we compared the effects of uncompetitive antagonists having a range of affinities for the NMDA receptor ion channel [dizocilpine, memantine, ibogaine, amantadine and 5-aminocarbonyl-10, 11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[a,d] cyclohepten-5,10-imine (ADCI)] in three behavioral assays typically used to assess NMDA receptor antagonism. Behavioral side effects were compared with the efficacy of the compounds to protect against NMDA-induced seizures.

RESULTS

Only dizocilpine and memantine substituted fully in mice trained to discriminate dizocilpine from saline. Dizocilpine (K(i) approximately 0.003 microM) protected against NMDA-induced convulsions at doses that produced ataxia and stimulation of locomotor activity. Conversely, memantine (K(i) approximately 0.54 microM) prevented convulsions at doses that were 8- to 18-fold lower than those producing ataxia or effects on locomotion, respectively. Indeed, in contrast to dizocilpine, memantine did not stimulate locomotor activity but only produced dose-dependent reductions. The low-affinity antagonists ibogaine (K(i) approximately 1 microM) and ADCI (K(i) approximately 11 microM) protected against convulsions at doses that produced significant dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects, ataxia and decreases in locomotor activity. Amantadine (K(i) approximately 11 microM) was ineffective against NMDA-induced convulsions up to doses that produced significant behavioral side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that only certain low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists (e.g., memantine) may have therapeutic efficacy at doses that do not produce an adverse side-effect profile. For other therapeutic endpoints, different estimates of efficacy and safety require derivation.

摘要

理论依据

据推测,低亲和力、非竞争性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂可能具有治疗效果(如在癫痫、中风、药物依赖方面),且不会产生与高亲和力配体(如地卓西平、苯环利定)相关的不良副作用。

目的

确定低亲和力NMDA拮抗剂是否比高亲和力配体具有更大的预测治疗窗。

方法

在瑞士韦伯斯特小鼠中,我们比较了对NMDA受体离子通道具有一系列亲和力的非竞争性拮抗剂[地卓西平、美金刚、伊博格碱、金刚烷胺和5-氨基羰基-10,11-二氢-5H-二苯并[a,d]环庚烯-5,10-亚胺(ADCI)]在三种通常用于评估NMDA受体拮抗作用的行为学试验中的效果。将行为学副作用与化合物预防NMDA诱导癫痫发作的效果进行比较。

结果

只有地卓西平和美金刚在经过训练能区分地卓西平和生理盐水的小鼠中完全替代。地卓西平(K(i)约为0.003 microM)在产生共济失调和刺激运动活性的剂量下可预防NMDA诱导的惊厥。相反,美金刚(K(i)约为0.54 microM)在分别比产生共济失调或对运动有影响的剂量低8至18倍的剂量下预防惊厥。实际上,与地卓西平不同,美金刚不会刺激运动活性,而只会产生剂量依赖性降低。低亲和力拮抗剂伊博格碱(K(i)约为1 microM)和ADCI(K(i)约为11 microM)在产生显著的地卓西平样辨别刺激效应、共济失调和运动活性降低的剂量下预防惊厥。金刚烷胺(K(i)约为11 microM)在产生显著行为学副作用的剂量之前对NMDA诱导的惊厥无效。

结论

这些发现表明,只有某些低亲和力、非竞争性NMDA拮抗剂(如美金刚)可能在不产生不良副作用的剂量下具有治疗效果。对于其他治疗终点,需要推导不同的疗效和安全性估计值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验