Kompa S, Langefeld S, Kirchhof B, Schrage N
Augenklinik der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52070 Aachen, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;237(11):915-9. doi: 10.1007/s004170050386.
The aetiology of most cases of keratitis remains unclear because the causative agents respond to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Problems occur when they become resistant to local therapies. Further diagnostic measures such as corneal scrapings or biopsies are then necessary. In order to ensure early and gentle biopsy followed by effective diagnosis within 24 h, corneal biopsy specimens were obtained with a microtrephine.
Microbiopsies were obtained from 28 patients suffering from corneal infiltrates or ulcerative keratitis. Different stainings were used to identify the pathogens. Photographs of the clinical healing process were taken immediately after biopsy and during the follow-up.
One hundred and ten microbiopsies were performed. One hundred and eighteen specimens could be obtained. No perforation occurred. In 5 of 10 cases in which herpetic keratitis was predicted, herpes DNA could be confirmed. The other five cases were found to be caused by other microbes. In 15 of 18 cases, the bacterial pathogen could be confirmed by Gram's stain diagnosis after microtrephination. Corneal smear was positive in only 7 of these cases. In 2 of 6 cases, predicted to be caused by fungi, lactophenol-blue staining of the microbiopsies showed positive results. Corneal smear was positive in only 1 of these 2 fungal cases. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. No worsening of the disease as a result of treatment could be observed.
The confirmation of microbial cause of keratitis is more effective using microbiopsy than with corneal smears. As a result of the effective treatment after biopsy diagnosis, the majority of cases of keratitis healed. Local therapy seems to have been optimised due to the unroofing of infection during biopsy as well. Therefore microbiopsy in combination with laboratory diagnosis may prove to be a very useful diagnostic and possibly therapeutic method in the clinical routine.
大多数角膜炎病例的病因仍不明确,因为病原体对广谱抗生素有反应。当它们对局部治疗产生耐药性时,问题就出现了。此时就需要进一步的诊断措施,如角膜刮片或活检。为了确保在24小时内进行早期、温和的活检并获得有效诊断,使用微型环钻获取角膜活检标本。
对28例角膜浸润或溃疡性角膜炎患者进行微生物活检。采用不同的染色方法鉴定病原体。在活检后立即及随访期间拍摄临床愈合过程的照片。
共进行了110次微生物活检。获取了118份标本。未发生穿孔。在预测为疱疹性角膜炎的10例病例中,有5例证实存在疱疹DNA。另外5例由其他微生物引起。在18例中的15例中,微型环钻取材后通过革兰氏染色诊断证实了细菌病原体。这些病例中只有7例角膜涂片呈阳性。在预测为真菌引起的6例病例中的2例中,微生物活检的乳酚蓝染色显示阳性结果。这2例真菌病例中只有1例角膜涂片呈阳性。未发生术中或术后并发症。未观察到因治疗导致疾病恶化的情况。
使用微生物活检确诊角膜炎的微生物病因比角膜涂片更有效。活检诊断后进行有效治疗,大多数角膜炎病例得以治愈。由于活检过程中感染灶的暴露,局部治疗似乎也得到了优化。因此,微生物活检结合实验室诊断可能是临床常规中一种非常有用的诊断甚至治疗方法。