Kaufmann T U, Veraguth D, Linder T E
Klinik und Poliklinik für Otorhinolaryngologie, Hals- und Gesichtschirurgie Universitätsspital Zürich.
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1999 Oct 9;129(40):1450-5.
Since the introduction of tympanostomy tubes by Armstrong in 1952, physicians and patients alike have been concerned about the possible harm associated with water entering the middle ear via tubes. It is the current practice of many physicians to advise patients to avoid water entering the middle ear by using water precautions when swimming. However, the potential harmful effect of water in causing otorrhoea and otalgia still remains controversial.
A prospective study was performed analysing the effect of water exposure in patients with tympanostomy tubes, both those who do and those who do not take water precautions. Between January 1996 and January 1997, patients who had tympanostomy tubes inserted were assigned to one of two groups on the basis of parental preference. Group I consisted of children who were allowed to swim without water protection, while in group II the children were instructed to use water protection whenever swimming. Once assigned, patients remained in that group. The parents were required to keep a diary documenting the number of days the child went swimming and experienced otorrhoea, otalgia or symptoms relating to an upper respiratory tract infection. Of the 86 patients enrolled in the study, comprehensive follow-up information was available in 63 (47 children in group I and 16 in group II).
The mean period of follow-up was 8 months. The incidence of otorrhoea/otalgia after swimming was 36% in group I and 25% in group II. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.39). The symptoms of otorrhoea and otalgia were of short duration and self-limiting in the vast majority of the patients. It was necessary to remove the tympanostomy tube in only one patient.
In patients with tympanostomy tubes swimming without water precaution does not predispose to otorrhoea. On the basis of this study, previous investigations using in vitro models, and the literature, it is currently our practice to permit children to swim without water precautions two weeks after insertion of a tympanostomy tube.
自1952年阿姆斯特朗引入鼓膜置管以来,医生和患者都一直担心水通过置管进入中耳可能带来的危害。目前许多医生的做法是建议患者在游泳时采取防水措施,避免水进入中耳。然而,水导致耳漏和耳痛的潜在有害影响仍存在争议。
进行了一项前瞻性研究,分析鼓膜置管患者接触水的影响,分为采取防水措施和未采取防水措施两组。1996年1月至1997年1月期间,根据家长的意愿,将插入鼓膜置管的患者分为两组。第一组为允许在不采取防水措施的情况下游泳的儿童,而第二组儿童被指示在每次游泳时都使用防水措施。一旦分组,患者就留在该组。要求家长记日记,记录孩子游泳的天数以及出现耳漏、耳痛或上呼吸道感染相关症状的天数。在86名纳入研究的患者中,有63名(第一组47名儿童,第二组16名儿童)获得了全面的随访信息。
平均随访期为8个月。第一组游泳后耳漏/耳痛的发生率为36%,第二组为25%。两组之间的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.39)。在绝大多数患者中,耳漏和耳痛症状持续时间短且具有自限性。仅1例患者需要取出鼓膜置管。
鼓膜置管患者在不采取防水措施的情况下游泳不会引发耳漏。基于本研究、之前使用体外模型的调查以及文献,目前我们的做法是允许儿童在插入鼓膜置管两周后在不采取防水措施的情况下游泳。