相似文献
1
PNAS joins peer-reviewed PubMed Central. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Nature. 1999 Oct 21;401(6755):733. doi: 10.1038/44427.
2
Publishing paradigms.
Nat Genet. 1999 Apr;21(4):341-2. doi: 10.1038/7659.
3
Scientific publishing. PNAS nixes special privileges for (most) papers.
Science. 2009 Sep 18;325(5947):1486-7. doi: 10.1126/science.325_1486b.
4
Mixed response to NIH's web journal plan.
Nature. 1999 May 6;399(6731):8-9. doi: 10.1038/19822.
5
The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
J Neuroophthalmol. 2008 Mar;28(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181678618.
6
National Academy of Sciences endorses National Institutes of Health plan for enhanced access to research information.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 19;101(42):14991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407071101. Epub 2004 Oct 12.
7
Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502201102. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
8
BioMed Central boosted by editorial board.
Nature. 2000 May 25;405(6785):384. doi: 10.1038/35013218.
9
E-biomed.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Oct;87(4):485-6.
10
All parties on edge as NIH delays open-access briefing.
Nature. 2005 Jan 20;433(7023):182. doi: 10.1038/433182b.
Zotero 插件