J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1858-68.
To monitor treatment results and survival in chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) and the introduction of interferon alpha (IFNalpha).
Disease course was monitored in 840 patients younger than 56 years who were registered onto prospective studies between 1984 and 1991 and were assigned to conventional chemotherapy (CHT) or IFNalpha therapy. One hundred twenty of these patients received allogeneic bone marrow in the chronic phase from an HLA-identical sibling without T-cell depletion (standard alloBMT).
Patient distribution by risk and by presenting features was the same in the transplantation and nontransplantation cohorts, but age was different (median, 32 v 42 years). Results were analyzed by age and by Sokal's relative risk. Among low-risk patients, 10-year survival rates with standard alloBMT versus IFNalpha therapy versus CHT were 57% v 49% (P =.76) v 25% (P =.001), respectively, and among patients at higher risk, rates were 54% v 17% (P =.01) v 12% (P =. 001). Among patients < or = 32 years old, the 10-year survival rates were 65% v 35% (P =.05) v 24% (P =.001), respectively, but for patients older than 32 years, 10-year survival rates were 46% for standard alloBMT versus 31% for IFNalpha therapy (P =.62) versus 16% for conventional CHT (P =.05). The data did not change when the calculations were based on the transplantations that were performed within 1 year of diagnosis.
Any policy of standard alloBMT was associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional CHT, irrespective of age and risk. When the comparison was made with IFNalpha therapy, a policy of standard alloBMT, including early transplantation, was found to increase survival only in those patients who were younger or at intermediate or high risk.
监测异基因骨髓移植(alloBMT)及引入干扰素α(IFNα)后慢性髓性白血病的治疗效果和生存率。
对840例年龄小于56岁的患者的病程进行了监测,这些患者在1984年至1991年间登记参加前瞻性研究,并被分配接受传统化疗(CHT)或IFNα治疗。其中120例患者在慢性期接受了来自HLA匹配同胞且未进行T细胞去除的异基因骨髓移植(标准alloBMT)。
移植组和非移植组患者按风险和呈现特征的分布相同,但年龄不同(中位数分别为32岁和42岁)。结果按年龄和索卡尔相对风险进行分析。在低风险患者中,标准alloBMT、IFNα治疗和CHT的10年生存率分别为57%、49%(P = 0.76)和25%(P = 0.001),在高风险患者中,生存率分别为54%、17%(P = 0.01)和12%(P = 0.001)。在年龄小于或等于32岁的患者中,10年生存率分别为65%、35%(P = 0.05)和24%(P = 0.001),但对于年龄大于32岁的患者,标准alloBMT的10年生存率为46%,IFNα治疗为31%(P = 0.62),传统CHT为16%(P = 0.05)。当计算基于诊断后1年内进行的移植时,数据没有变化。
与传统CHT相比,任何标准alloBMT策略均与显著更长的生存期相关,无论年龄和风险如何。当与IFNα治疗进行比较时,发现标准alloBMT策略,包括早期移植,仅在年轻或中高风险患者中提高生存率。