Suppr超能文献

高剂量与标准剂量非格司亭(重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子)用于动员异基因供者外周血祖细胞及CD34(+)免疫选择

High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection.

作者信息

Engelhardt M, Bertz H, Afting M, Waller C F, Finke J

机构信息

Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jul;17(7):2160-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2160.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The efficacy of a high- versus a standard-dose filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or rhG-CSF) regimen to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation was investigated in 75 healthy donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1994 to December 1997, 75 consecutive donors (median age, 38 years; range, 17 to 67 years) were assigned to two different schedules of rhG-CSF for PBPC mobilization. Fifty donors received 24 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (BW) divided into two daily subcutaneous injections (two doses of 12 microg, group A), whereas 25 were treated with 10 microg rhG-CSF once daily (group B). Apheresis was started on day 4 in group A and on day 5 in group B. Target CD34(+) cell numbers in apheresis products were >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW.

RESULTS

Cytokine priming and collection of PBPCs were equally well tolerated in both groups. Significantly higher CD34(+) cell numbers in group A with 3. 7 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.47 x 10(6)/L apheresis) compared with 2 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.25 x 10(6)/L apharesis) in group B were obtained (P <.05). Using standard aphereses (median, 9 L), two doses of 12 microg rhG-CSF/kg allowed collection of >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells with two aphereses (range, one to three) in group A versus three aphereses (range, one to six) in group B (P <.015). Donor age, sex, and BW influenced the collection of CD34(+) cell numbers: in particular, significantly higher apheresis results were obtained in donors younger than 40 years compared with donors older than 40 years of age (P <.05). In 65 CD34(+) selection procedures using avidin-biotin immunoabsorption columns (Ceprate SC System, CellPro, Bothell, WA), a median CD34(+) purity of 53%, CD34(+) recovery of 40%, and the collection of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells/selection were achieved. In group A with higher CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis, CD34(+) purity, recovery, and cell yields were 60%, 45%, and 2.3 x 10(6)/kg/selection, respectively, as compared with 48%, 31%, and 0.7 x 10(6)/kg in group B (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that twice daily rhG-CSF (two doses of 12 microg/kg BM) compared with once daily rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg BW), in addition to being well tolerated, significantly improves PBPC mobilization, allows the collection of higher numbers of CD34(+) cells with one or two standard aphereses, and facilitates subsequent selection procedures in healthy allogeneic donors.

摘要

目的

在75名健康供者中研究高剂量与标准剂量非格司亭(重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子,即rhG-CSF)方案动员外周血祖细胞(PBPCs)用于异基因移植的疗效。

患者与方法

1994年12月至1997年12月,75名连续的供者(中位年龄38岁;范围17至67岁)被分配至两种不同的rhG-CSF方案用于PBPC动员。50名供者接受24μg rhG-CSF/kg体重(BW),分为每日两次皮下注射(两剂,各12μg,A组),而25名供者接受每日一次10μg rhG-CSF治疗(B组)。A组在第4天开始进行单采,B组在第5天开始。单采产品中的目标CD34(+)细胞数≥4×10⁶/kg受者BW。

结果

两组对细胞因子启动和PBPC采集的耐受性均良好。A组的CD34(+)细胞数显著高于B组,A组为3.7×10⁶/kg受者BW/单采(0.47×10⁶/L单采),而B组为2×10⁶/kg受者BW/单采(0.25×10⁶/L单采)(P<.05)。使用标准单采量(中位值9L),A组给予两剂12μg rhG-CSF/kg,两次单采(范围1至3次)可采集到≥4×10⁶/kg CD34(+)细胞,而B组则需要三次单采(范围1至6次)(P<.015)。供者年龄、性别和体重影响CD34(+)细胞数的采集:特别是,年龄小于40岁的供者单采结果显著高于年龄大于40岁的供者(P<.05)。在65次使用抗生物素蛋白-生物素免疫吸附柱(Ceprate SC系统,CellPro,华盛顿州博塞尔)的CD34(+)选择程序中,CD34(+)纯度中位数为53%,CD34(+)回收率为40%,每次选择可采集到2×10⁶/kg CD34(+)细胞。A组单采时每千克CD34(+)细胞数更高,其CD34(+)纯度、回收率和细胞产量分别为60%、45%和2.3×10⁶/kg/选择,而B组分别为48%、31%和0.7×10⁶/kg(P<.05)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与每日一次rhG-CSF(10μg/kg BW)相比,每日两次rhG-CSF(两剂12μg/kg BW)除耐受性良好外,还能显著改善PBPC动员,使用一或两次标准单采即可采集到更多数量的CD34(+)细胞,并便于健康异基因供者后续的选择程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验