Keller C, Brimacombe J
Cairns Base Hospital, Australia.
Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jun;82(6):922-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.6.922.
We tested the hypothesis that pressures exerted on the pharyngeal mucosa by the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) differ, in 20 male and 20 female adult patients. Microchip pressure sensors were attached to the LMA and COPA at four similar anatomical locations (base of the tongue, lateral pharynx, posterior pharynx and distal oropharynx) and two dissimilar locations (LMA, piriform fossa and hypopharynx; COPA, middle of the tongue and proximal oropharynx). Cuff volume was adjusted until oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) was 10 cm H2O and mucosal pressures were recorded. This was repeated at an OLP of 15 cm H2O and at maximal OLP. Overall mucosal pressures were higher for the COPA than the LMA at 10 cm H2O (17 vs 3 cm H2O; P < 0.0001), at 15 cm H2O (21 vs 6 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) and at maximal OLP (26 vs 9 cm H2O; P < 0.0001). Mucosal pressures were always higher for the COPA at the base of the tongue, posterior pharynx and lateral pharynx, but were similar in the distal oropharynx. Maximal OLP was higher for the LMA than the COPA (27 (95% confidence intervals 25-29) vs 16 (12-19) cm H2O; P < 0.0001). We conclude that pressures acting on the mucosa were higher with the COPA compared with the LMA.
我们在20名成年男性和20名成年女性患者中检验了以下假设:喉罩气道(LMA)和带套囊口咽气道(COPA)对咽黏膜施加的压力不同。微芯片压力传感器被连接到LMA和COPA的四个相似解剖位置(舌根、咽外侧、咽后壁和口咽远端)以及两个不同位置(LMA,梨状窝和下咽;COPA,舌中部和口咽近端)。调整套囊容积直至口咽漏气压(OLP)为10 cm H₂O,并记录黏膜压力。在OLP为15 cm H₂O时及最大OLP时重复此操作。在10 cm H₂O(17 vs 3 cm H₂O;P < 0.0001)、15 cm H₂O(21 vs 6 cm H₂O;P < 0.0001)和最大OLP时(26 vs 9 cm H₂O;P < 0.0001),COPA的总体黏膜压力均高于LMA。在舌根、咽后壁和咽外侧,COPA的黏膜压力始终较高,但在口咽远端两者相似。LMA的最大OLP高于COPA(27(9 ‑ 5%置信区间25 - 29)vs 16(12 - 19)cm H₂O;P < 0.0001)。我们得出结论,与LMA相比,COPA作用于黏膜的压力更高。