Povinelli D J, Landry A M, Theall L A, Clark B R, Castille C M
Center for Child Studies, University of Southwestern Louisiana 70504-4287, USA.
Dev Psychol. 1999 Nov;35(6):1426-39. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.6.1426.
The results of 6 studies (involving 304 children) suggested that 4- and 5-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, understand that very recent past events determine the present. In Studies 1-3, 3- and 4-year-old children were introduced to 2 empty hiding locations. With children's backs to these locations, a camera recorded an experimenter secretly hiding a puppet in one of them. Children then viewed the videotape of what had just happened, along with another tape that depicted identical events except with a different child and with the puppet hidden in the other location. Only 4-year-olds were subsequently able to locate the puppet, even though 3-year-olds remembered the contents of the tapes and understood the equivalence between the video events and the real world. In Study 4, similar effects were obtained when a verbal analog of the test was presented to 3-5-year-olds. Studies 5 and 6 showed that when children observed 2 events in which they had just participated, only 5-year-olds understood that the most recent events were relevant.
6项研究(涉及304名儿童)的结果表明,4岁和5岁的儿童能理解最近发生的过去事件决定当下情况,而3岁儿童则不能。在研究1至3中,向3岁和4岁儿童介绍了2个空的隐藏地点。当孩子们背对着这些地点时,一台摄像机记录了一名实验者秘密地将一个木偶藏在其中一个地点的过程。然后,孩子们观看了刚刚发生事情的录像带,以及另一盘录像带,后者描绘了相同的事件,只是换了一个孩子,并且木偶藏在了另一个地点。尽管3岁儿童记住了录像带的内容,并且理解了视频事件与现实世界之间的等效性,但只有4岁儿童随后能够找到木偶。在研究4中,当向3至5岁儿童呈现测试的语言类似物时,也获得了类似的效果。研究5和6表明,当儿童观察他们刚刚参与的2个事件时,只有5岁儿童理解最近的事件是相关的。