Huguet P, Galvaing M P, Monteil J M, Dumas F
Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale de la Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Nov;77(5):1011-25. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1011.
In contrast with R. B. Zajonc's (1965) classic view about social facilitation-inhibition (SFI) effects, it was found that the presence of relatively unpredictable audiences and forced social comparison with a slightly superior coactor both facilitated performance in the Stroop task while inhibiting automatic verbal processing. Not only do these findings reveal that social presence can help inhibit the emission of dominant responses, providing further support for an attentional view of SFI effects, but they also demonstrate the power of social situations over what has been thought to be invariant automatic processing. As such, they are inconsistent with the view reiterated in more than 500 articles on Stroop interference over the past 60 years and suggest that more attention should be paid to the situations in which cognition takes place.
与R. B. 扎荣茨(1965)关于社会促进-抑制(SFI)效应的经典观点相反,研究发现,相对不可预测的观众的在场以及与略占优势的共同行动者的强制社会比较,在促进斯特鲁普任务表现的同时,也抑制了自动言语加工。这些发现不仅揭示了社会在场有助于抑制优势反应的发出,为SFI效应的注意观点提供了进一步支持,而且还证明了社会情境对被认为是不变的自动加工的影响力。因此,它们与过去60年里500多篇关于斯特鲁普干扰的文章中反复提及的观点不一致,并表明应该更多地关注认知发生的情境。