Suppr超能文献

思维控制问卷——临床样本中的心理测量特性及其与创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的关系。

The Thought Control Questionnaire--psychometric properties in a clinical sample, and relationships with PTSD and depression.

作者信息

Reynolds M, Wells A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1999 Sep;29(5):1089-99. doi: 10.1017/s003329179900104x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in research suggest that particular attempts to control thoughts may contribute to the problem of intrusion. An instrument capable of identifying strategies for dealing with unwanted intrusions in clinical populations may be used for differentiating between thought control strategies that may or may not be helpful.

METHODS

The Thought Control Questionnaire (TCQ) (Wells & Davies, 1994) developed and validated on a normal sample, was administered to a clinical sample in order to investigate the consistency of the original factor structure and its psychometric properties. The sensitivity of the scale to change associated with recovery was also examined. Relationships between individual differences in thought control strategies and psychiatric symptoms in patients with DSM-IV major depression, and PTSD with or without major depression were investigated.

RESULTS

The Scree Test suggested a six-factor solution which was rotated. This solution split the original distraction subscale into separate behavioural and cognitive distraction, otherwise the subscales were almost identical to those obtained in non-clinical subjects. As this split has been shown to be unreliable, further analyses in this study were based on the five-factor version of the TCQ obtained by Wells & Davies (1994). Predictors of recovery and of symptoms in PTSD and depression were explored.

CONCLUSIONS

Correlations between the TCQ subscales and other measures suggest that particular thought control strategies may be associated with the symptoms of PTSD and depression. The TCQ scales appear to be sensitive to changes associated with recovery. Significant differences emerged in thought control strategies between depressed and PTSD patients. Hierarchical regression analysis showed distraction, punishment and reappraisal control strategies predicted depression scores in depressed patients while use of distraction predicted intrusions in PTSD.

摘要

背景

近期研究进展表明,特定的控制思维尝试可能会导致侵入性问题。一种能够识别临床人群中应对不必要侵入性思维策略的工具,可用于区分可能有帮助或无帮助的思维控制策略。

方法

对一个临床样本施测在正常样本中开发并验证的思维控制问卷(TCQ)(韦尔斯和戴维斯,1994年),以研究原始因子结构的一致性及其心理测量特性。还检验了该量表对与康复相关变化的敏感性。研究了DSM-IV重度抑郁症患者以及伴或不伴重度抑郁症的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者在思维控制策略上的个体差异与精神症状之间的关系。

结果

碎石检验表明采用六因子解并进行旋转。该解将原始的分心子量表分为单独的行为分心和认知分心,否则各子量表与在非临床受试者中获得的子量表几乎相同。由于这种划分已被证明不可靠,本研究的进一步分析基于韦尔斯和戴维斯(1994年)获得的TCQ五因子版本。探索了PTSD和抑郁症康复及症状的预测因素。

结论

TCQ子量表与其他测量指标之间的相关性表明,特定的思维控制策略可能与PTSD和抑郁症的症状相关。TCQ量表似乎对与康复相关的变化敏感。抑郁症患者和PTSD患者在思维控制策略上出现显著差异。分层回归分析表明,分心、惩罚和重新评估控制策略可预测抑郁症患者的抑郁得分,而使用分心策略可预测PTSD患者的侵入性思维。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验