Golan L, Birkmeyer J D, Welch H G
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont 05009-0001, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Nov 2;131(9):660-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-9-199911020-00005.
Although guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for diabetic patients with microalbuminuria, this strategy requires that providers adhere to screening recommendations. In addition, the benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in normoalbuminuric patients was recently demonstrated.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating all patients with type 2 diabetes.
Markov model simulating the progression of diabetic nephropathy.
Randomized trials estimating the progression of diabetic nephropathy with and without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Patients 50 years of age with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose level > or = 7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL]).
Lifetime.
Societal.
Patients received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, screening for microalbuminuria, or screening for gross proteinuria.
Lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and marginal cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Screening for gross proteinuria had the highest cost and the lowest benefit. Compared with screening for microalbuminuria, treating all patients was more expensive ($15240 and $14940 per patient) but was associated with increased quality-adjusted life expectancy (11.82 and 11.78 quality-adjusted life-years). The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio was $7500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
Results were sensitive to the cost, effectiveness, and quality of life associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, as well as age at diagnosis. The model was relatively insensitive to adherence with screening and costs of treating end-stage renal disease.
Treating all middle-aged diabetic patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is a simple strategy that provides additional benefit at modest additional cost. The strategy assumes that patients meet the older diagnostic criteria for diabetes and makes sense only for those who are not bothered by treatment.
尽管指南推荐血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂用于患有微量白蛋白尿的糖尿病患者,但该策略要求医疗服务提供者遵守筛查建议。此外,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在正常白蛋白尿患者中的益处最近得到了证实。
评估治疗所有2型糖尿病患者的成本效益。
模拟糖尿病肾病进展的马尔可夫模型。
估计使用和不使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂时糖尿病肾病进展的随机试验。
50岁新诊断为2型糖尿病的患者(空腹血糖水平≥7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL])。
终生。
社会视角。
患者接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗、微量白蛋白尿筛查或大量蛋白尿筛查。
终生成本、质量调整生命预期和边际成本效益。
大量蛋白尿筛查成本最高,效益最低。与微量白蛋白尿筛查相比,治疗所有患者成本更高(每位患者分别为15240美元和14940美元),但质量调整生命预期增加(分别为11.82和11.78个质量调整生命年)。每获得一个质量调整生命年的边际成本效益比为7500美元。
结果对与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗相关的成本、有效性和生活质量以及诊断时的年龄敏感。该模型对筛查依从性和终末期肾病治疗成本相对不敏感。
用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗所有中年糖尿病患者是一种简单的策略,以适度增加的成本提供额外益处。该策略假定患者符合较旧的糖尿病诊断标准,并且仅对那些不因治疗而烦恼的患者有意义。