Suppr超能文献

临床前神经保护和恢复性药物研发标准建议。

Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development.

机构信息

UMass/Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2752-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2752.

Abstract

The plethora of failed clinical trials with neuroprotective drugs for acute ischemic stroke have raised justifiable concerns about how best to proceed for the future development of such interventions. Preclinical testing of neuroprotective drugs is an important aspect of assessing their therapeutic potential, but guidelines concerning how to perform preclinical development of purported neuroprotective drugs for acute ischemic stroke are lacking. This conference of academicians and industry representatives was convened to suggest such guidelines for the preclinical evaluation of neuroprotective drugs and to recommend to potential clinical investigators the data they should review to reassure themselves that a particular neuroprotective drug has a reasonable chance to succeed in an appropriately designed clinical trial. Without rigorous, robust, and detailed preclinical evaluation, it is unlikely that novel neuroprotective drugs will prove to be effective when tested in large, time-consuming, and expensive clinical trials. Additionally, similar recommendations are provided for drugs with the potential to enhance recovery after acute ischemic stroke, a burgeoning new field with great potential but little currently available data. The suggestions contained in this document are meant to serve as overall guidelines that must be adapted to the individual characteristics related to particular drugs and their preclinical and clinical development needs.

摘要

大量针对急性缺血性中风的神经保护药物临床试验失败,引发了对于此类干预措施未来如何最佳推进的合理担忧。神经保护药物的临床前测试是评估其治疗潜力的一个重要方面,但缺乏关于如何对声称用于急性缺血性中风的神经保护药物进行临床前开发的指南。此次院士与行业代表会议召开的目的是为此类神经保护药物的临床前评估提出此类指南,并向潜在的临床研究人员推荐他们应审查的数据,以使他们确信某种特定的神经保护药物在设计合理的临床试验中有合理的成功机会。如果没有严格、有力且详细的临床前评估,新型神经保护药物在大规模、耗时且昂贵的临床试验中进行测试时,不太可能证明是有效的。此外,对于有可能促进急性缺血性中风后恢复的药物也提供了类似建议,这是一个新兴的、潜力巨大但目前可用数据很少的领域。本文件中的建议旨在作为总体指南,必须根据与特定药物及其临床前和临床开发需求相关的个体特征进行调整。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验