Buchwalder-Csajka C, Buclin T, Brunner H R, Biollaz J
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;48(4):594-604. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00050.x.
The performance of the experimental paradigm of angiotensin challenges with continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement was evaluated. Angiotensin dose-response relationships were characterized, along with the influence of clinical covariates. The stability of angiotensin-induced peaks and the variability of the angiotensin doses were assessed. Finally, the predictive value of studies based on angiotensin challenges to determine drug doses effective in therapeutics was evaluated.
The data were gathered from 13 clinical studies on nine angiotensin II receptor antagonists, one ACE inhibitor and one dual ACE-NEP inhibitor, using Finapres for measuring the response to exogenous angiotensin challenges. Modelling of angiotensin dose-response curves and determination of the inter and intrasubject variability were performed by nonlinear regression (NONMEM). The different sources of variations in angiotensin I and II doses and angiotensin-induced peaks were evaluated by analyses of variance. The dose of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists inhibiting blood pressure increase by at least 75%, as measured by this method, was chosen for comparison with the labelled starting dose.
Angiotensin challenges exhibited a clear dose-response relationship which can be characterized both by an Emax or a log linear model. The log linear model gave an average systolic/diastolic response of 24+/-6/20+/-5 mmHg for a unit dose of 1 microgram of angiotensin II equivalents, and an increase of 6/6 mmHg for each doubling of the dose. The angiotensin ED50 calculated values were 0.67 microgram for systolic and 0.84 microgram for diastolic blood pressure. The angiotensin doses for eliciting a given response and the angiotensin induced peaks were fairly constant between period and subject, but vary significantly between studies. Based on an inhibition of blood pressure by 75%, the agreement was good between the doses of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists predicted from studies using the methodology of angiotensin challenges and the doses shown to be clinically efficacious, in spite of high intersubject and intrasubject variabilities.
This experimental method represents a valid surrogate for the therapeutic target and a useful tool for the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiling of drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system.
评估采用连续无创血压测量的血管紧张素激发实验范式的性能。对血管紧张素剂量-反应关系进行了表征,并分析了临床协变量的影响。评估了血管紧张素诱导峰值的稳定性以及血管紧张素剂量的变异性。最后,评估了基于血管紧张素激发实验来确定治疗有效药物剂量的研究的预测价值。
数据收集自13项关于9种血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂、1种ACE抑制剂和1种ACE-NEP双重抑制剂的临床研究,使用Finapres测量对外源性血管紧张素激发的反应。通过非线性回归(NONMEM)对血管紧张素剂量-反应曲线进行建模,并确定受试者间和受试者内的变异性。通过方差分析评估血管紧张素I和II剂量以及血管紧张素诱导峰值的不同变异来源。选择通过该方法测量能使血压升高至少75%得到抑制的ACE抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂的剂量,与标记的起始剂量进行比较。
血管紧张素激发实验呈现出明显的剂量-反应关系,可用Emax模型或对数线性模型进行表征。对数线性模型显示,对于1微克血管紧张素II等效物的单位剂量,平均收缩压/舒张压反应为24±6/20±5 mmHg,剂量每增加一倍,血压升高6/6 mmHg。计算得出的血管紧张素ED50收缩压为0.67微克,舒张压为0.84微克。引发给定反应的血管紧张素剂量和血管紧张素诱导的峰值在不同时间段和受试者之间相当恒定,但在不同研究之间差异显著。尽管受试者间和受试者内存在高度变异性,但基于血压抑制75%,采用血管紧张素激发实验方法预测的ACE抑制剂和血管紧张素受体拮抗剂剂量与临床有效剂量之间的一致性良好。
该实验方法是治疗靶点的有效替代指标,也是作用于肾素-血管紧张素系统药物的药代动力学和药效学分析的有用工具。