Kanaori K, Tamura Y, Wada T, Nishi M, Kanehara H, Morii T, Tajima K, Makino K
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki, Japan.
Biochemistry. 1999 Dec 7;38(49):16058-66. doi: 10.1021/bi9909344.
The duplex structures of the stereoregulated phosphorothioate DNAs, [R(p),R(p)]- and [S(p),S(p)]-[d(GC(ps)T(ps)ACG)] (ps, phosphorothioate; PS-DNA), with their complementary RNA have been investigated by combined use of (1)H NMR and restrained molecular dynamics calculation. Compared to those obtained for the unmodified duplex structures (PO-DNA.RNA), the NOE cross-peak intensities are virtually identical for the PS-DNA.RNA hybrid duplexes. The structural analysis on the basis of the NOE restraints reveals that all of the three DNA.RNA duplexes take a A-form conformation and that there is no significant difference in the base stacking for the DNA.RNA hybrid duplexes. On the other hand, the NOE cross-peak intensities of the protons around the central T(ps)A step of the PS-DNA.DNA duplexes are apparently different from those of PO-DNA. DNA. The chemical shifts of H8/6 and H1' at the T(ps)A step are also largely different among PS-DNA.DNAs and PO-DNA.DNA, suggesting that the DNA.DNA structure is readily changed by the introduction of the phosphorothioate groups to the central T(p)A step. The structure calculations indicate that all of these DNA.DNA duplexes are B-form although there exist some small differences in helical parameters between the [R(p),R(p)]- and [S(p),S(p)]PS-DNA.DNA duplexes. The melting temperatures (T(m)) were determined for all of the duplexes by plotting the chemical shift change of isolated peaks as a function of temperature. For the PS-DNA.RNA hybrid duplexes, the [S(p),S(p)] isomer is less stable than the [R(p),R(p)] isomer while this trend is reversed for the PS-DNA.DNA duplexes. Consequently, although the PS-DNA.RNA duplexes take the similar A-form structure, the duplex stability is different between PS-DNA.RNA duplexes. The stability of the DNA.RNA duplexes may not be governed by the A-form structure itself but by some other factors such as the hydration around the phosphorothioate backbone, although the T(m) difference of the DNA.DNA duplexes could be explained by the structural factor.
通过结合使用¹H NMR和受限分子动力学计算,对立体规整的硫代磷酸酯DNA,即[R(p),R(p)]-和[S(p),S(p)]-[d(GC(ps)T(ps)ACG)](ps,硫代磷酸酯;PS-DNA)与它们的互补RNA形成的双链结构进行了研究。与未修饰的双链结构(PO-DNA.RNA)相比,PS-DNA.RNA杂交双链的NOE交叉峰强度实际上是相同的。基于NOE限制的结构分析表明,所有三种DNA.RNA双链均呈A-型构象,并且DNA.RNA杂交双链在碱基堆积方面没有显著差异。另一方面,PS-DNA.DNA双链中央T(ps)A步周围质子的NOE交叉峰强度明显不同于PO-DNA.DNA的。T(ps)A步处H8/6和H1'的化学位移在PS-DNA.DNA和PO-DNA.DNA之间也有很大差异,这表明通过在中央T(p)A步引入硫代磷酸酯基团,DNA.DNA结构很容易发生变化。结构计算表明,所有这些DNA.DNA双链均为B-型,尽管[R(p),R(p)]-和[S(p),S(p)]-PS-DNA.DNA双链在螺旋参数上存在一些小差异。通过绘制孤立峰的化学位移变化与温度的函数关系,确定了所有双链的解链温度(T(m))。对于PS-DNA.RNA杂交双链,[S(p),S(p)]异构体比[R(p),R(p)]异构体稳定性差,而对于PS-DNA.DNA双链,这种趋势则相反。因此,尽管PS-DNA.RNA双链具有相似的A-型结构,但PS-DNA.RNA双链之间的双链稳定性不同。DNA.RNA双链的稳定性可能不是由A-型结构本身决定的,而是由其他一些因素决定的,例如硫代磷酸酯主链周围的水合作用,尽管DNA.DNA双链的T(m)差异可以用结构因素来解释。