Swartz M S, Swanson J W, Wagner H R, Burns B J, Hiday V A, Borum R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;156(12):1968-75. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1968.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of involuntary outpatient commitment in reducing rehospitalizations among individuals with severe mental illnesses.
Subjects who were hospitalized involuntarily were randomly assigned to be released (N = 135) or to continue under outpatient commitment (N = 129) after hospital discharge and followed for 1 year. Each subject received case management services plus additional outpatient treatment. Outpatient treatment and hospital use data were collected.
In bivariate analyses, the control and outpatient commitment groups did not differ significantly in hospital outcomes. However, subjects who underwent sustained periods of outpatient commitment beyond that of the initial court order had approximately 57% fewer readmissions and 20 fewer hospital days than control subjects. Sustained outpatient commitment was shown to be particularly effective for individuals with nonaffective psychotic disorders, reducing hospital readmissions approximately 72% and requiring 28 fewer hospital days. In repeated measures multivariable analyses, the outpatient commitment group had significantly better hospital outcomes, even without considering the total length of court-ordered outpatient commitments. However, in subsequent repeated measures analyses examining the role of outpatient treatment among psychotically disordered individuals, it was also found that sustained outpatient commitment reduced hospital readmissions only when combined with a higher intensity of outpatient treatment.
Outpatient commitment can work to reduce hospital readmissions and total hospital days when court orders are sustained and combined with intensive treatment, particularly for individuals with psychotic disorders. This use of outpatient commitment is not a substitute for intensive treatment; it requires a substantial commitment of treatment resources to be effective.
本研究的目的是评估非自愿门诊治疗对于减少重症精神疾病患者再次住院的有效性。
将非自愿住院的受试者在出院后随机分配为出院组(N = 135)或继续接受门诊治疗组(N = 129),并随访1年。每位受试者均接受病例管理服务及额外的门诊治疗。收集门诊治疗和住院使用数据。
在双变量分析中,对照组和门诊治疗组在住院结局方面无显著差异。然而,经历了超出初始法院命令时长的持续门诊治疗的受试者,其再次入院率比对照组约低57%,住院天数少20天。持续门诊治疗对非情感性精神障碍患者尤为有效,可使再次入院率降低约72%,住院天数减少28天。在重复测量多变量分析中,即使不考虑法院命令的门诊治疗总时长,门诊治疗组的住院结局也显著更好。然而,在随后检验门诊治疗在精神病性障碍患者中的作用的重复测量分析中,还发现持续门诊治疗仅在与更高强度的门诊治疗相结合时才会降低再次入院率。
当法院命令持续且与强化治疗相结合时,门诊治疗可有效减少再次入院率和总住院天数,尤其是对患有精神障碍的个体。这种门诊治疗的使用并非强化治疗的替代方法;它需要大量的治疗资源投入才能有效。