Widdig A, Streich W J, Tembrock G
Institut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Am J Primatol. 2000 Jan;50(1):37-51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(200001)50:1<37::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO;2-3.
A coalition is formed when one animal intervenes in an ongoing conflict between two parties to support one side. Since support of one party is also an act against the other party, coalitions are triadic interactions involving a supporter, a recipient, and a target. The purpose of this study was to test which of three possible theories explains coalition formation among male Barbary macaques: 1) Males support kin to enhance their indirect fitness (kin selection). 2) Males support nonkin to receive future reciprocal support (reciprocal altruism). 3) Males pursue self-interests and immediately benefit via nonkin support (cooperation). Coalition formation was investigated among 31 semi-free male Barbary macaques in the Salem Monkey Park, Germany during the mating season. The results show: 1) Males intervened more often in dyadic conflicts in which a related opponent was involved and supported related opponents more than unrelated opponents. Close kin supported each other more often than distant kin. 2) Some evidence for reciprocal support was found. However, reciprocity was probably a by-product of targeting the same individuals for dominance. 3) Coalition formation among nonkin is best interpreted as cooperation, based on self-interests. Male Barbary macaques seem to intervene more often to stabilize and less often to improve their rank. Although our data were limited, the results revealed that kin support, reciprocal support, and cooperative support were all involved in coalition formation among male Barbary macaques.
当一只动物介入两方之间正在进行的冲突以支持其中一方时,联盟就形成了。由于支持一方也是对另一方的一种行为,联盟是一种三元互动,涉及支持者、接受者和目标。本研究的目的是测试三种可能的理论中的哪一种能够解释雄性北非猕猴之间的联盟形成:1)雄性支持亲属以提高其间接适合度(亲缘选择)。2)雄性支持非亲属以获得未来的互惠支持(互惠利他主义)。3)雄性追求自身利益并通过非亲属支持立即受益(合作)。在交配季节,对德国塞勒姆猴园的31只半放养雄性北非猕猴之间的联盟形成进行了调查。结果表明:1)雄性更频繁地介入涉及相关对手的二元冲突,并比不相关对手更多地支持相关对手。近亲比远亲更频繁地相互支持。2)发现了一些互惠支持的证据。然而,互惠可能是针对同一个体进行支配的副产品。3)基于自身利益,非亲属之间的联盟形成最好解释为合作。雄性北非猕猴似乎更多地为了稳定等级而介入,较少地为了提升等级而介入。尽管我们的数据有限,但结果表明亲缘支持、互惠支持和合作支持都参与了雄性北非猕猴之间的联盟形成。